Re: I Hate find_vtable_meth_ns()

2007-06-13 Thread chromatic
On Wednesday 13 June 2007 16:54:54 Jonathan Worthington wrote: > Yes, I'd like to see this. I did the groundwork for it already, by > refactoring the NameSpace PMC so that there is a place to hang such a > thing off now (just add it to the underlying struct), though I was doing > it so there was a

Re: I Hate find_vtable_meth_ns()

2007-06-13 Thread Jonathan Worthington
chromatic wrote: I wonder if changing the Namespace PMC to store all vtable methods in such a way that an indexed lookup will work is a benefit. It might simplify the code even further. Yes, I'd like to see this. I did the groundwork for it already, by refactoring the NameSpace PMC so that

perl6 likes the new find_vtable_meth_ns() (was Re: I Hate find_vtable_meth_ns())

2007-06-13 Thread jerry gay
On 6/13/07, Kevin Tew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: My patch only fails these tests. this patch is better now that you added the case chromatic missed. the location of the free_list segfault that perl6 experiences now occurs when compiling the perl6 grammar, instead of when the test suite was run

Re: I Hate find_vtable_meth_ns()

2007-06-13 Thread chromatic
On Wednesday 13 June 2007 14:46:33 Kevin Tew wrote: > My patch only fails these tests. > > Failed Test Stat Wstat Total Fail List of Failed > --- > t/library/range.t 1 25678 18 70-78 > t/pmc/parrot

Re: I Hate find_vtable_meth_ns()

2007-06-13 Thread Kevin Tew
My patch only fails these tests. Failed Test Stat Wstat Total Fail List of Failed --- t/library/range.t 1 25678 18 70-78 t/pmc/parrotobject.t1 256111 3 Chromatic was right, vtable