On Fri, 19 Sep 2003, Nicholas Clark wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 19, 2003 at 02:24:12PM -0400, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> > Looking at my install here, I see I've got gcc 2.95, 3.0, 3.2, and 3.3
> > installed, with 3.3 being the default gcc. Is it worth running tinders
> > with different versions of gcc, or
On Fri, Sep 19, 2003 at 02:24:12PM -0400, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> Looking at my install here, I see I've got gcc 2.95, 3.0, 3.2, and 3.3
> installed, with 3.3 being the default gcc. Is it worth running tinders
> with different versions of gcc, or shall I just leave things as-is and
> assume earlie
