On Fri, 19 Sep 2003, Nicholas Clark wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 19, 2003 at 02:24:12PM -0400, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> > Looking at my install here, I see I've got gcc 2.95, 3.0, 3.2, and 3.3
> > installed, with 3.3 being the default gcc. Is it worth running tinders
> > with different versions of gcc, or shall I just leave things as-is and
> > assume earlier versions can manage to sort themselves out?
>
> I think running multiple versions would be useful.
> I don't have anything with 3.2 any more, and the only machine I have with 3.0
> may get upgraded. We're doing clever tricks with turning on gcc warnings
> based on version number, so it would be good to verify that we've not screwed
> up anywhere.
Point. Okay, I'll set it up that way.
Dan
