Re: DOS filename collisions

2002-12-04 Thread Dan Sugalski
At 11:16 AM -0800 12/4/02, Michael G Schwern wrote: On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 02:03:06PM -0500, Dan Sugalski wrote: >> DOS isn't an intended compilation target, no. > >Not even djgpp? Hadn't planned on it. What advantage does it give over windows? It'll compile C programs on a 386/SX, 20M of

Re: DOS filename collisions

2002-12-04 Thread John Siracusa
On 12/4/02 2:16 PM, Michael G Schwern wrote: > On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 02:03:06PM -0500, Dan Sugalski wrote: DOS isn't an intended compilation target, no. >>> Not even djgpp? >> >> Hadn't planned on it. What advantage does it give over windows? > > It'll compile C programs on a 386/SX, 20M o

Re: DOS filename collisions

2002-12-04 Thread Michael G Schwern
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 02:03:06PM -0500, Dan Sugalski wrote: > >> DOS isn't an intended compilation target, no. > > > >Not even djgpp? > > Hadn't planned on it. What advantage does it give over windows? It'll compile C programs on a 386/SX, 20M of disk, 4megs of RAM and some form of DOS. Dunno

Re: DOS filename collisions

2002-12-04 Thread Dan Sugalski
At 10:01 AM -0800 12/4/02, Michael G Schwern wrote: On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 10:32:41AM -0500, Dan Sugalski wrote: At 6:58 AM -0800 12/4/02, Mr. Nobody wrote: >There are some files in parrot that have names common in the first 8 >characters. This will cause problems if someone tries to compile

Re: DOS filename collisions

2002-12-04 Thread Michael G Schwern
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 10:32:41AM -0500, Dan Sugalski wrote: > At 6:58 AM -0800 12/4/02, Mr. Nobody wrote: > >There are some files in parrot that have names common in the first 8 > >characters. This will cause problems if someone tries to compile Parrot on > >DOS. Is DOS an intended target, or sho

Re: DOS filename collisions

2002-12-04 Thread Dan Sugalski
At 6:58 AM -0800 12/4/02, Mr. Nobody wrote: There are some files in parrot that have names common in the first 8 characters. This will cause problems if someone tries to compile Parrot on DOS. Is DOS an intended target, or should we not worry about this? DOS isn't an intended compilation target,

Re: DOS filename collisions

2002-12-04 Thread Aldo Calpini
Mr. Nobody wrote: > There are some files in parrot that have names common in the first 8 > characters. This will cause problems if someone tries to compile Parrot on > DOS. Is DOS an intended target, or should we not worry about this? my vote is NO. let us bury 8.3 very, very deep in the ground.