jerry gay wrote:
> On 12/12/05, Ron Blaschke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> arithmetics.t suffers from -0.0 vs 0.0 problems. We've had something
>> similar some time ago. They seem to have changed that in 8.0, as the
>> test passes there.
>>
> it seems msvc 6.0 matches the behavior of 8.0 (meaning
On 12/12/05, Ron Blaschke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Here's a side by side comparison, Revision 10460, of
> Visual C++ 7.1 and 8.0.
>
great!
> arithmetics.t suffers from -0.0 vs 0.0 problems. We've had something
> similar some time ago. They seem to have changed that in 8.0, as the
> test pass
Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> On Dec 10, 2005, at 16:50, Ron Blaschke wrote:
Here's a side by side comparison, Revision 10460, of
Visual C++ 7.1 and 8.0.
arithmetics.t suffers from -0.0 vs 0.0 problems. We've had something
similar some time ago. They seem to have changed that in 8.0, as the
test pas
On Dec 10, 2005, at 16:50, Ron Blaschke wrote:
The following test results are taken from Revision 10428 on a Windows
XP, Visual C++ 2005 Express Edition box.
Doesn't look too bad.
Indeed.
Failed Test Stat Wstat Total Fail Failed List of Failed
--
