Leopold Toetsch wrote: > On Dec 10, 2005, at 16:50, Ron Blaschke wrote: Here's a side by side comparison, Revision 10460, of Visual C++ 7.1 and 8.0.
arithmetics.t suffers from -0.0 vs 0.0 problems. We've had something similar some time ago. They seem to have changed that in 8.0, as the test passes there. Let me know at which things I should have a look, if any. Don't know if anyone else is working on them. Also, if I should add a few lines at README.win32. Visual C++ 7.1 ============== Failed Test Stat Wstat Total Fail Failed List of Failed ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- t/examples/pasm.t 1 256 7 1 14.29% 5 t/examples/pir.t 1 256 17 1 5.88% 10 t/op/arithmetics.t 1 256 26 1 3.85% 7 t/pmc/env.t 2 512 12 2 16.67% 9-10 t/pmc/eval.t 1 256 18 1 5.56% 13 6 tests and 364 subtests skipped. Failed 5/180 test scripts, 97.22% okay. 6/4064 subtests failed, 99.85% okay. Visual C++ 8.0 ============== Failed Test Stat Wstat Total Fail Failed List of Failed ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- t/examples/pasm.t 1 256 7 1 14.29% 5 t/examples/pir.t 1 256 17 1 5.88% 10 t/pmc/env.t 2 512 12 2 16.67% 9-10 t/pmc/eval.t 1 256 18 1 5.56% 13 6 tests and 364 subtests skipped. Failed 4/180 test scripts, 97.78% okay. 5/4064 subtests failed, 99.88% okay. Ron
