At 3:38 PM -0500 3/28/02, Josh Wilmes wrote:
>Should we be using bugs6 for all patches?
Certainly not required--I want the patches more than I want people to
jump through any extra hoops. I won't object if people do, though. :)
>At 15:04 on 03/28/2002 EST, Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
Should we be using bugs6 for all patches?
--Josh
At 15:04 on 03/28/2002 EST, Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> When you come across bugs, or there are things that should be
> implemented but aren't, could folks make entries in the perl 6
> bugtracking system so we don't lose track? ht
When you come across bugs, or there are things that should be
implemented but aren't, could folks make entries in the perl 6
bugtracking system so we don't lose track? http://bugs6.perl.org.
Thanks.
(And don't feel like any code I've written is sacrosanct--it's not,
and I'm happy to have it y
