After years of neglected maintenance, we had to shut down the
pugs svn repository. It caused undue strain on the server that
hosted it, and made it nearly unusable.
Therefore we needed an alternative; since many active Perl 6
developers prefer git to svn anyway, we[1] decided to go with github
pugs-comm...@feather.perl6.nl wrote:
> +The C<.perl> method will produce a decimal number if the denominator is
> +a multiple of 10. Otherwise it will normalize and return a rational
> +literal of the form -47/3.
Did you mean "a power of 10" instead? I can't se
Kyle Hasselbacher wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 5, 2009 at 11:33 PM, Patrick R. Michaud wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 06, 2009 at 06:28:27AM +0200, pugs-comm...@feather.perl6.nl
>> wrote:
>>> +# RT #57336
>>> +{
>>> +# XXX Right message?
>>> +my $good
On Sun, Jul 5, 2009 at 11:33 PM, Patrick R. Michaud wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 06, 2009 at 06:28:27AM +0200, pugs-comm...@feather.perl6.nl wrote:
>> +# RT #57336
>> +{
>> + # XXX Right message?
>> + my $good_message = q{Lexical 'self' not found};
>> +
On Mon, Jul 06, 2009 at 06:28:27AM +0200, pugs-comm...@feather.perl6.nl wrote:
> +# RT #57336
> +{
> +# XXX Right message?
> +my $good_message = q{Lexical 'self' not found};
> +my $bad_code;
> +
> +$bad_code = '$.a';
> +eval $ba
pugs-comm...@feather.perl6.nl wrote:
> Author: kyle
> Date: 2009-07-04 19:26:48 +0200 (Sat, 04 Jul 2009)
> New Revision: 27404
>
> Modified:
>t/syntax/hyper_latin1.t
> Log:
> [t] Further mutated t/syntax/hyper_latin1.t
>
> Mod
I started to look into this and got stuck loading pugs in ghci, about
which I posted at
http://www.perlmonks.org/?node_id=750768
The INSTALL file mentions a make ghci target but that appears to be gone now.
Any chance of getting it back?
Em Sex, 2009-03-06 às 18:51 +0100, TSa escreveu:
> I know that the use of 'is also' is called monkey patching but I can't
> understand why this is regarded as a bad thing. Having a class assembled
> from multiple modules is a rather normal affair.
You're describing Roles here, which is something y
HaloO,
Larry Wall wrote:
Although, interestingly, if the method is exported as a multi it
should automatically add in the current role or class as a constraint
on the (former) invocant so that multi dispatch will not overgeneralize.
I would expect
class Foo
{
method bar {...}
On Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 12:15:18PM +1100, Timothy S. Nelson wrote:
> On Thu, 5 Mar 2009, Patrick R. Michaud wrote:
>> Also, I personally would prefer to not see explicit typing
>> on the invocants to most methods.
>
> Agreed. I wonder what I was thinking :).
Although, interestingly, if the
On Thu, 5 Mar 2009, Patrick R. Michaud wrote:
Log:
- Moved "defined" and "undefined" from Scalar.pod to Any.pod,
as per signature
...
+=item defined
+
+ our Bool multi defined ( Any $thing )
+ our Bool multi defined ( Any $thing, ::role )
+ our Bool multi method defined ( A
> Log:
> - Moved "defined" and "undefined" from Scalar.pod to Any.pod, as per
> signature
> ...
> +=item defined
> +
> + our Bool multi defined ( Any $thing )
> + our Bool multi defined ( Any $thing, ::role )
> + our Bool multi method defined ( Any $self)
> + our Bool multi method defined
I've got pugs installed now. I had to tell cabal where I installed my
aftermarket libraries:
pinky ~/pugs $ cabal install pugs --extra-lib-dirs=/usr/local/lib
--extra-include-dirs=/usr/local/include
.
pinky ~/pugs $ pugs
__
/\ __ \
\ \ \/\ \ __ __ __ __ (P)
Hi, I'm having some trouble building pugs.
GHC 6.10.1 installed OK, as did cabal-install and all its
dependencies, but cabal install pugs dies, at trying to build
haskeline-0.6.1.2.
apparently "IConv.hsc" is including "h_iconv.h" which has an error.
AFter the build I tr
alternative
: ports for irc on freenode)... so, i wonder, is there is a website
: where i can paste perl6 code and test it against the current versions
: of rakudo and pugs and STD.pm?
If you can ssh, then you can run irssi on any outside machine where
you have an account. Several people do this
´ve tried alternative
> ports for irc on freenode)... so, i wonder, is there is a website
> where i can paste perl6 code and test it against the current versions
> of rakudo and pugs and STD.pm?
>
>
no, there isn't. unless you count the fourth link at
http://feather.perl6
website
where i can paste perl6 code and test it against the current versions
of rakudo and pugs and STD.pm?
# New Ticket Created by Gabor Szabo
# Please include the string: [perl #61940]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=61940 >
Nor is it implemented in rakudo.
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 11:18:01AM -0800, Larry Wall wrote:
> Anyway, feel free to coordinate this here and/or on #perl6. (Note
> that Patrick is in the process of moving all the Synopses to the pugs
> repo at some point soon, so the current S16 in pugs/docs/Perl6/Spec
> is likely
On Sun, Oct 05, 2008 at 08:03:43PM +0200, Moritz Lenz wrote:
: Patrick R. Michaud wrote:
: > On Fri, Oct 03, 2008 at 10:02:56AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
: >> +#?rakudo skip ',='
: >> +#?DOES 2
: >> +{
: >> +my @a = 1, 2;
: >> +is (@a ,= 3, 4).join('|'), '1|2|3|4', ',= on lists works
Patrick R. Michaud wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 03, 2008 at 10:02:56AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> +#?rakudo skip ',='
>> +#?DOES 2
>> +{
>> +my @a = 1, 2;
>> +is (@a ,= 3, 4).join('|'), '1|2|3|4', ',= on lists works the same as
>> push (return value)'
>> +is @a.join('|'), '1|2|3|4',
On Fri, Oct 03, 2008 at 10:02:56AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> +#?rakudo skip ',='
> +#?DOES 2
> +{
> +my @a = 1, 2;
> +is (@a ,= 3, 4).join('|'), '1|2|3|4', ',= on lists works the same as
> push (return value)'
> +is @a.join('|'), '1|2|3|4', ',= on lists works the same as push
Index: docs/tutorial/ch06_objects.pod
===
--- docs/tutorial/ch06_objects.pod (revision 22303)
+++ docs/tutorial/ch06_objects.pod (revision 22304)
@@ -48,11 +47,25 @@
...
}
+And an embedded class:
+
+ class Heart::
On Wed Dec 05 04:49:22 2007, pcoch wrote:
> In languages/pugs/pmc/pugscapture.pmc:retval() there is the todo item:
>
> /* XXX getting non existent value, exception or undef?
>
> It looks like we need to determine at this point whether or not the value
> we are getting do
On Wed Dec 05 04:53:15 2007, pcoch wrote:
> In languages/pugs/pmc/pugscapture.pmc there are todo items of the form:
>
> /* XXX Warning: use of uninitialized value */
>
> This looks very similar to RT#48170 which was in the regex language. Does
> this todo item mean that we
On Sat Jul 26 15:58:14 2008, particle wrote:
> languages/pugs/ was for a pugs interface to parrot. the code was
> already bitrotten long before pugs development stalled, and parrot has
> changed significantly since then. remove the dirs, files from the
> manifest and config syste
# New Ticket Created by Jerry Gay
# Please include the string: [perl #57312]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=57312 >
languages/pugs/ was for a pugs interface to parrot. the code was
already bitrotten l
Can somebody give me a working link on how to installs pugs or parrot on
win xp?
I have downloaded from http://jnthn.net/perl6/ both
http://jnthn.net/perl6/pugs-win32.zip
http://jnthn.net/perl6/parrot-win32.zip
after extracting the pugs-win32..
I tried to double-click on pugs.exe but I got
Can somebody give me a working link on how to installs pugs or parrot on
win xp?
I have downloaded from http://jnthn.net/perl6/ both
http://jnthn.net/perl6/pugs-win32.zip
http://jnthn.net/perl6/parrot-win32.zip
after extracting the pugs-win32..
I tried to double-click on pugs.exe but I got
Ryan Richter wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 03, 2008 at 12:03:00PM +0200, Moritz Lenz wrote:
>> My last successful build was r18093 with GHC 6.6.1.
>> Maybe we should just die in Makefile.PL until somebody finds a fix.
>
> Maybe we should just revert the pugs source to t
On Tue, Jun 03, 2008 at 12:03:00PM +0200, Moritz Lenz wrote:
> My last successful build was r18093 with GHC 6.6.1.
> Maybe we should just die in Makefile.PL until somebody finds a fix.
Maybe we should just revert the pugs source to that rev. Haven't the
modifications since then bas
Hi,
Gerd Pokorra wrote:
> building pugs under Fedora 9 doesn't work. With every revision I get the
> following error by executing the command "make":
...
> Generating precompiled Prelude, Math::Basic... pugs: Internal error:
> Invalid grammatical category: "
Hello,
building pugs under Fedora 9 doesn't work. With every revision I get the
following error by executing the command "make":
Gerd Pokorra
[EMAIL PROTECTED] pugs]$ make
.
.
.
[1 of 1] Compiling Main ( src/Main.hs, src/Main.o )
Linking pugs.new ...
/us
Jesse asked about getting t/pugs/operator/arith.t to run
on Rakudo, as written arith.t depends on the ".nextwith"
capability from S06. For example:
sub tryok ($ok, $todo) {
if ($todo) {
&ok.nextwith($ok,$todo, :todo);
} else {
&ok.nextwith($ok)
I'd like to announce the first commit of "pugspc".
pugspc is a stand-alone Perl 6 to PIR compiler branched off from Pugs.
My aim with pugspc is not to compete with rakudo but to preserve and
maintain the know-how built into Pugs.
Currently pugspc passes fewer tests than rakudo,
Mark A. Hershberger wrote:
> The recent perl6 brouhaha got me to try out pugs again.
>
> After grabbing pugs from svn and running the smoke tests
> (http://xrl.us/bdipe), I noticed some ext/File-Util/t/03.dirs.t was
> failing and looked like it would be a relatively easy fix.
>
The recent perl6 brouhaha got me to try out pugs again.
After grabbing pugs from svn and running the smoke tests
(http://xrl.us/bdipe), I noticed some ext/File-Util/t/03.dirs.t was
failing and looked like it would be a relatively easy fix.
Diff attached.
I worked from the File::Util docs on
Allison Randal dijo [Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 03:27:33PM +0200]:
>
> How difficult would it be to set up a debian-parrot group? It would
> consist of the specific Parrot team members who have responsibility
> for packaging and uploading Parrot (understanding that each would
> need to apply as a DM). W
Allison Randal dijo [Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 02:14:35PM +0200]:
> Indeed. Parrot is a complete virtual machine similar to Mono or
> Java. As such, it's likely that Parrot will ultimately split into a
> few more packages than it currently has, including parrot-modules,
> parrot-dev, and packages for ru
Jeremiah Foster wrote:
How difficult would it be to set up a debian-parrot group?
Not hard at all. As Martin mentioned, debian has a development machine
called alioth which hosts a GForge repository, if that is the right
word. http://alioth.debian.org/
This sounds like the ideal solution,
> > In short, "teams" i.e. debian-perl are internal debian groups with
> > upload rights.
>
> How difficult would it be to set up a debian-parrot group?
Not hard at all. As Martin mentioned, debian has a development machine
called alioth which hosts a GForge repository, if that is the right
html (left column,
> under "PTS subscription"). If you select "Advanced Mode", you
> can chose only to get bug reports.
>
> Moritz
>
> > Allison
> >
> > Moritz Lenz wrote:
> >> Good localtime(),
> >>
> >> The
> > Usually the debian maintainer is responsible for forwarding bugs,
> > since parrot is maintainer-less it appears that this didn't
> happen. I
> > will look into this and see if I can forward them.
>
> Thanks, that would be helpful.
Here is the first bug, it appears to be a debian bug an
> From: Allison Randal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Indeed. Parrot is a complete virtual machine similar to Mono
> or Java. As such, it's likely that Parrot will ultimately
> split into a few more packages than it currently has,
> including parrot-modules, parrot-dev, and packages for
> ru
On Dec 19, 2007 10:27 AM, Allison Randal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How difficult would it be to set up a debian-parrot group? It would
> consist of the specific Parrot team members who have responsibility for
> packaging and uploading Parrot (understanding that each would need to
> apply as a D
Jeremiah Foster wrote:
That document assumes that the team "parrot-porters" is a group of
debian developers working together to maintain parrot in debian, it is a
document aimed at debian developers. However I cannot find a debian team
called "parrot-porters". I assume this is the name that the
Jeremiah Foster wrote:
Parrot is a bit of different beastie than the perl modules we normally
handle. But I am fairly certain someone here would be willing to help. I
am not very familiar with parrot aside from having read some articles on
PIR and seen a couple talks, but it is still a bit over
an.org/p/parrot.html (left column, under "PTS
subscription"). If you select "Advanced Mode", you can chose only to get
bug reports.
Moritz
> Allison
>
> Moritz Lenz wrote:
>> Good localtime(),
>>
>> The Debian packages for pugs and parrot have been o
our ticket queue? We're not aware of the 2 RC
bugs referenced by your issue #444708.
Allison
Moritz Lenz wrote:
Good localtime(),
The Debian packages for pugs and parrot have been orphaned, i.e. they
have no maintainer anymore, and will disappear from Debian if nobody
takes over:
Good localtime(),
The Debian packages for pugs and parrot have been orphaned, i.e. they
have no maintainer anymore, and will disappear from Debian if nobody
takes over:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=444708
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=444711
If anybody
# New Ticket Created by Paul Cochrane
# Please include the string: [perl #48176]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=48176 >
In languages/pugs/pmc/pugscapture.pmc there are todo items of the form:
/*
# New Ticket Created by Paul Cochrane
# Please include the string: [perl #48174]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=48174 >
In languages/pugs/pmc/pugscapture.pmc there are todo items which read:
/* XXX sho
# New Ticket Created by Paul Cochrane
# Please include the string: [perl #48172]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=48172 >
In languages/pugs/pmc/pugscapture.pmc:retval() there is the todo item:
/* XXX gett
On Mon, Nov 19, 2007 at 04:01:45PM +, Wim Vanderbauwhede wrote:
> Hi Vadrer,
>
> The svn diff is attached, have a look at the notes below as well. If no-one
> protests very hard in the next 2 days I'll commit it to the repository. I
Well, I didn't like this bit :-)
Index: SLAVES
Darren Duncan wrote:
> At 4:02 PM + 11/17/07, Wim Vanderbauwhede wrote:
>> I have patched Pugs for compilation with GHC 6.8.1. However, the changes
>> break the 6.6.1 build (a.o. because of the change in the bytestring
>> API and
>> the way wobbly types are handle
At 4:02 PM + 11/17/07, Wim Vanderbauwhede wrote:
I have patched Pugs for compilation with GHC 6.8.1. However, the changes
break the 6.6.1 build (a.o. because of the change in the bytestring API and
the way wobbly types are handled).
So do we stick with 6.6.1 or upgrade to 6.8.1?
Cheers
I have patched Pugs for compilation with GHC 6.8.1. However, the changes
break the 6.6.1 build (a.o. because of the change in the bytestring API and
the way wobbly types are handled).
So do we stick with 6.6.1 or upgrade to 6.8.1?
Cheers,
Wim
On Fri, Sep 07, 2007 at 03:00:36PM +0100, Wim Vanderbauwhede wrote:
: On 07/09/2007, Chas Owens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
: >
: > On 9/7/07, Wim Vanderbauwhede <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
: > > The following program works fine in pugs r17041 (which is the rev of
: >
In a message dated Fri, 7 Sep 2007, Wim Vanderbauwhede writes:
On 07/09/2007, Chas Owens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Even
if strict weren't in effect this code should not work since the $x in
the closure is not the one created after the closure:
perl -le 'my$r=sub{print $x+1};my $x = 2;$r->()'
Wim (>):
> I think it could be a GHC bug: I rebuilt r17041 with ghc-6.6.1 (just a few
> changes to use the new filepath package in Pugs.hs and Pugs/Run.hs) and it
> shows the bug. I assume the pugs on feather really is r17041, to be really
> sure I should build r17041 with ghc-6.6.
I think it could be a GHC bug: I rebuilt r17041 with ghc-6.6.1 (just a few
changes to use the new filepath package in Pugs.hs and Pugs/Run.hs) and it
shows the bug. I assume the pugs on feather really is r17041, to be really
sure I should build r17041 with ghc-6.6. I should manage that next week
Wim (>):
> The following program works fine in pugs r17041 (which is the rev of
> /usr/bin/pugs on feather):
>
> my $r=\{say $x+1};
> my $x=2;
> $r();
>
> With r17041, this gives 3;
> However, on the latest pugs (r17615 or later), it gives an error:
> ***
>
On 07/09/2007, Chas Owens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 9/7/07, Wim Vanderbauwhede <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The following program works fine in pugs r17041 (which is the rev of
> > /usr/bin/pugs on feather):
> >
> > my $r=\{say $x+1};
> &
On 9/7/07, Wim Vanderbauwhede <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The following program works fine in pugs r17041 (which is the rev of
> /usr/bin/pugs on feather):
>
> my $r=\{say $x+1};
> my $x=2;
> $r();
>
> With r17041, this gives 3;
> However, on the latest pugs (r1
The following program works fine in pugs r17041 (which is the rev of
/usr/bin/pugs on feather):
my $r=\{say $x+1};
my $x=2;
$r();
With r17041, this gives 3;
However, on the latest pugs (r17615 or later), it gives an error:
***
Unexpected "$r"
expecting "=", &
On Mon, Sep 03, 2007 at 07:31:10AM -0700, Larry Wall wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 03, 2007 at 01:01:28PM +0200, Wolfgang Laun wrote:
>
> : The latest version Perl6-Pugs-6.2.13 from October 2006 didn't even compile.
>
> Perhaps that's a mercy. :)
>
> Anyway, you'll
On Mon, Sep 03, 2007 at 01:01:28PM +0200, Wolfgang Laun wrote:
: The pugscode page <http://www.pugscode.org/> contains the hint
:
: "Periodic releases will appear on CPAN under the Perl6-Pugs
: <http://search.cpan.org/dist/Perl6-Pugs/> namespace."
Well, hey, it doesn
The pugscode page <http://www.pugscode.org/> contains the hint
"Periodic releases will appear on CPAN under the Perl6-Pugs
<http://search.cpan.org/dist/Perl6-Pugs/> namespace."
Is this still true? The latest version Perl6-Pugs-6.2.13 from October
2006 didn't even compile.
kr
Wolfgang
This proposal is the result of several days of IRC talks and research
into how tests are handled by Parrot and Pugs, and how to reorganize
the pugs test suite to make it more amenable to testing to other
compilers.
Proposal:
Each test in the test suite should be broken down into functional or
# from Paul Cochrane
# on Thursday 31 May 2007 01:42 pm:
> It is possible to get anonymous svn access to the pugs
>source, but svn won't allow you to check out source from a different
>repository into another repository's path
Maybe I'm missing something, but what I'
d suggest using
rsync to pull the sources across, however, we'd have to get the admins
of svn.openfoundry.org to allow anonymous rsync download access. This
would be similar to the 'make rsync' target in the parrot Makefile at
present. It is possible to get anonymous svn access to
sources across, however, we'd have to get the admins
of svn.openfoundry.org to allow anonymous rsync download access. This
would be similar to the 'make rsync' target in the parrot Makefile at
present. It is possible to get anonymous svn access to the pugs
source, but svn won&#
# New Ticket Created by Will Coleda
# Please include the string: [perl #43081]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=43081 >
For now, the pugs repository contains the master copy of the perl6 test
suite.
在 Apr 20, 2007 7:45 PM 時，Agent Zhang 寫到：
On 4/13/07, Agent Zhang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Okay, I think I've fixed the bug by defaulting to YAML.pm instead of
YAML::Syck. As confirmed by Ingy++, The current version of YAML::Syck
on CPAN is having problem with single-quotes in its emitter:
ht
On 4/13/07, Agent Zhang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 4/13/07, Moritz Lenz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I just found out that after the smoke test a new smoke.yml is in the
> repository's root, but no smoke.html.
[...]
> I guess that t/xx-uncategorized/value_alias_readonly.t is indeed the
>
neration of the HTML report.
Can I somehow convert smoke.yml to smoke.html without doing the full smoke?
Not sure whether this journal is related or not:
http://use.perl.org/~chromatic/journal/31865
Well, I have no clue if chromatic's patch has been applied on the Pugs side.
Hope this helps.
Cheers, agentz
Hi,
Since a week or so interactive pugs fails when run with PUGS_SAFEMODE=1:
Loading Prelude... Reloading Prelude from source...pugs: user error (*** ***
Can't modify constant item: VUndef
at line 781, column 9-46
line 781, column 9-46
at)
Wim
--
If it's
Hi,
Moritz Lenz wrote:
> for a few weeks now I haven't been able to complete a single "make
> smoke" in the pugs repository.
>
> The last test producing an output is:
> t/builtins/strings/uc.t
> # Actual: ß
>
> at that point there are no more m
Hi,
Larry Wall wrote:
> Looks like some kind of resource exhaustion or lockup, possibly with
> the embedded/tunneled Perl 5, but it's hard to guess without more
> information like OS, locale, etc. most of which would be supplied by:
>
> pugs -V
> perl -V
>
Looks like some kind of resource exhaustion or lockup, possibly with
the embedded/tunneled Perl 5, but it's hard to guess without more
information like OS, locale, etc. most of which would be supplied by:
pugs -V
perl -V
env
If you provide that sort of info, we can compare wit
Hi,
for a few weeks now I haven't been able to complete a single "make
smoke" in the pugs repository.
The last test producing an output is:
t/builtins/strings/uc.t
# Actual: ß
at that point there are no more messages for ~ 10 minutes, and there are
instances of pugs running
Hello,
This note is a request for help from anyone that is saavy with the
Pugs internals such that they can add a few small features, to the
parser mainly, without too much difficulty.
While trying to port a significant codebase (ext/QDRDBMS/) to Perl 6
from Perl 5, I discovered that a few
On 07/03/08 01:10 -0800, Julian Fondren wrote:
[...]
> Index: languages/ook/MAINTAINER
> ===
> --- languages/ook/MAINTAINER (revision 0)
> +++ languages/ook/MAINTAINER (revision 0)
> @@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
> +N: Jerome Quelini
> +E: [EMAIL
s patch makes all-but-(perl5|pugs|t) each have such a file.
A MAINTAINER file has these advantages:
1. It is very, very, very visible. If you grab parrot
and root around the languages a bit and for any reason
("have you looked at eForth? It implements itself almost
> 在 Feb 6, 2007 11:07 PM 時，Gabor Szabo 寫到：
>> ... the link to the Win32 binary builds of Pugs and Parrot
>> brings me to http://jnthn.net/public_html/perl6/ which is 404.
on 2/6/2007 7:21 PM Audrey Tang said the following:
> Fix the rakudo wiki to point to http://jnthn.net/p
在 Feb 6, 2007 11:07 PM 時，Gabor Szabo 寫到：
On http://www.pugscode.org/ when I click "Download"
I get to the wiki on rakudo and (yippi it works again !)
but the link to the Win32 binary builds of Pugs and Parrot
brings me to http://jnthn.net/public_html/perl6/ which is 404.
Fix the r
On http://www.pugscode.org/ when I click "Download"
I get to the wiki on rakudo and (yippi it works again !)
but the link to the Win32 binary builds of Pugs and Parrot
brings me to http://jnthn.net/public_html/perl6/ which is 404.
Gabor
On Wed, Dec 20, 2006 at 10:26:41AM -0600, Jonathan Rockway wrote:
: Ovid wrote:
: (reversed the message a bit)
: > is 'b', any('a' .. 'h'), 'junctions should work';
:
: This looks like a Test "bug"; it's doing something like:
:
:is 'b', 'a' # not ok
:is 'b', 'b' # ok
:is 'b', 'c' #
Ovid wrote:
(reversed the message a bit)
> is 'b', any('a' .. 'h'), 'junctions should work';
This looks like a Test "bug"; it's doing something like:
is 'b', 'a' # not ok
is 'b', 'b' # ok
is 'b', 'c' # not ok
...
If you write:
ok 'b' === any('a'..'h')
The result is one passing
Hi all,
use v6-alpha;
sub no_donut_for_you (Str $junction) {
state $count = 0;
$count++;
return $count;
}
say no_donut_for_you( any( 'a' .. 'd' ) );
no_donut_for_you( any( 'a' .. 'd' ) ).say;
That outputs something like the following on my system (Version: 6.2.13
(r14
--- Gaal Yahas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 02:14:42AM -0800, Ovid wrote:
> > pugs $ pugs t/general/basic.t
> > pugs: user error (***
> > Unexpected "Str"
> > expecting "\\", ":", "*&qu
On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 02:14:42AM -0800, Ovid wrote:
> pugs $ pugs t/general/basic.t
> pugs: user error (***
> Unexpected "Str"
> expecting "\\", ":", "*", parameter name or ")"
> at /usr/local/lib/per
Hi all,
Just built GHC 6.6 from source (oh joy!) and upgraded to Pugs Version:
6.2.13 (r14881). After building it I did a "make install" and in the
pugs directory, I tried this:
pugs $ pugs t/general/basic.t
pugs: user error (***
Unexpected "Str&q
After a week of planning, and with plenty of help from clkao++, obra+
+, #jifty, #bps and #perl6, I'm glad to announce that Pugs now has a
new, permanent URL for its subversion repository:
http://svn.pugscode.org/pugs/ (HTTP)
https://svn.pugscode.org/pugs/ (HTTPS)
Subversion
After nearly four months of development and 3400+ commits, I'm very glad
to announce that Pugs 6.2.13 is now available:
http://pugs.blogs.com/dist/Perl6-Pugs-6.2.13.tar.gz
SIZE: 6839270
SHA1: b06b8434c64e9bb5e3ab482282fbae0a6ba69218
Motivated by increasing use of Pugs in produ
On 9/25/06, Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi folks,
Read the journal
http://pugs.blogs.com/pugs/2006/09/check_smoke_res.html
Follow the link:
http://m19s28.vlinux.de/cgi-bin/pugs-smokeserv.pl?
Click at a recent entry with a SYN link
Then click on "02 Syntax&q
Hi folks,
Read the journal
http://pugs.blogs.com/pugs/2006/09/check_smoke_res.html
Follow the link:
http://m19s28.vlinux.de/cgi-bin/pugs-smokeserv.pl?
Click at a recent entry with a SYN link
Then click on "02 Syntax"
Then on e.g.:
- Show the snippet from t/syntax/unicode.t (line 7
On Sep 17, 2006, at 4:32 AM, Agent Zhang wrote:
Tonight, Audrey implemented the bridge between Pugs' Haskell core and
the Perl 5 module Pugs::Compiler::Rule, thus bringing rules support to
our pugs ``for free''. This is really good news to us. :)
For more than one year, Pu
Tonight, Audrey implemented the bridge between Pugs' Haskell core and
the Perl 5 module Pugs::Compiler::Rule, thus bringing rules support to
our pugs ``for free''. This is really good news to us. :)
For more than one year, Pugs had required parrot to provide full Perl
6 regexes
5?
It's too late to do it today (it takes about 2 hours), and I'm not
using computer tomorrow, so I'll try again on monday.
I just tried it and pugs r12945 (with parrot r14400) works :)
Thanks for fixing it even if you couldn't duplicate it :)
--
Markus Laire
1 - 100 of 708 matches
Mail list logo
