On Saturday 16 June 2007 23:41:30 Andy Lester wrote:
> I cringe at functions where the behavior is dependent on parms passed
> in. In the case of Parrot_get_runtime_prefix, if you call it as
> Parrot_get_runtime_prefix(&str) then str is populated, or if you call
> Parrot_get_runtime_prefix(NULL)
On Sun, 17 Jun 2007 01:41:30 -0500
Andy Lester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I cringe at functions where the behavior is dependent on parms
> passed in. In the case of Parrot_get_runtime_prefix, if you call it
> as Parrot_get_runtime_prefix(&str) then str is populated, or if you
> call Parrot_get_
I cringe at functions where the behavior is dependent on parms passed
in. In the case of Parrot_get_runtime_prefix, if you call it as
Parrot_get_runtime_prefix(&str) then str is populated, or if you call
Parrot_get_runtime_prefix(NULL) then you get a malloced string.
It should be split int
