Re: Parrot on HP-UX

2005-06-05 Thread Leopold Toetsch
Nick Glencross wrote: Nick Glencross wrote: Folks, I hope that not too many of you are getting fed up with me going on about HP-UX. I'm nearly there with having it working with manually hacked Makefiles etc. I've nearly finished making my updates. I need some help on one aspect though...

Re: Parrot on HP-UX

2005-06-05 Thread Nick Glencross
Nick Glencross wrote: Nick Glencross wrote: extend.o and nci_test.o need to be built with $(CC_SHARED) in addition to the normal flags. What's the most straightforward way of doing this? I've had a couple of experiments with config/gen/makefiles/root.in, but don't know what the 'right thing'

Re: Parrot on HP-UX

2005-06-05 Thread Nick Glencross
Nick Glencross wrote: Folks, I hope that not too many of you are getting fed up with me going on about HP-UX. I'm nearly there with having it working with manually hacked Makefiles etc. I've nearly finished making my updates. I need some help on one aspect though... extend.o and nci_test

Re: Parrot on HP-UX

2005-06-05 Thread H.Merijn Brand
On Sun, 05 Jun 2005 17:05:13 +0100, Nick Glencross <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Folks, > > I hope that not too many of you are getting fed up with me going on > about HP-UX. I'm nearly there with having it working with manually > hacked Makefiles etc. > > Some tweaks will be needed to the Conf

Re: Parrot on HP-UX

2005-06-05 Thread Nick Glencross
Nick Glencross wrote: Folks, I hope that not too many of you are getting fed up with me going on about HP-UX. I'm nearly there with having it working with manually hacked Makefiles etc. My hacked HP-UX build now passes most tests. Wohooo! Failed Test Stat Wstat Total Fail Failed

Parrot on HP-UX

2005-06-05 Thread Nick Glencross
Folks, I hope that not too many of you are getting fed up with me going on about HP-UX. I'm nearly there with having it working with manually hacked Makefiles etc. Some tweaks will be needed to the Configure tests (not too many), but I'd just like to summarise what I believe to be the 'big p

Re: parrot on HP-UX etc

2003-07-30 Thread Leopold Toetsch
H.Merijn Brand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > cpp: "io/io_buf.c", line 65: warning 2001: Redefinition of macro MAX. That's fixed. > cc: "timer.c", line 75: error 1000: Unexpected symbol: "32". Some seem to have defined "TIMER_MAX". I prepended "PARROT_" to all. > HP-UX 10.20/32: > Determining yo

Re: parrot on HP-UX etc

2003-07-29 Thread Simon Glover
On 29 Jul 2003, Juergen Boemmels wrote: > Simon Glover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Tue, 29 Jul 2003, H.Merijn Brand wrote: > > > iii) protect them with #ifdef MAX/#endif > > I bet the definition of MAX and MIN on HP-UX is identical to my > definition. I would not be surprised. > Ok, h

Re: parrot on HP-UX etc

2003-07-29 Thread Juergen Boemmels
Index: io/io_buf.c === RCS file: /cvs/public/parrot/io/io_buf.c,v retrieving revision 1.6 diff -u -r1.6 io_buf.c --- io/io_buf.c 21 Jul 2003 18:00:45 - 1.6 +++ io/io_buf.c 29 Jul 2003 18:31:39 - @@ -62,9 +62,6 @@ size_t PIO_bu

Re: parrot on HP-UX etc

2003-07-29 Thread Simon Glover
On Tue, 29 Jul 2003, H.Merijn Brand wrote: > On Tue 29 Jul 2003 16:40, Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi Merijn, > > > HP-UX 11.00/32 2 CPU: > > : > io/io_buf.c > cpp: "io/io_buf.c", line 65: warning 2001: Redefinition of macro MAX. > cpp: "io/io_buf.c", line 66: warning 2001: Red

Re: parrot on HP-UX etc

2003-07-29 Thread H.Merijn Brand
On Tue 29 Jul 2003 16:40, Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Merijn, > > > Available: > > > > HP-UX 11.00 32bit 1 or 2 CPU's HP C-ANSI-C and gcc-3.3 > > HP-UX 11.00 64bit 1 or 2 CPU's HP C-ANSI-C and gcc-3.3 > > HP-UX 10.20 32bit HP C-ANSI-C and gcc-3.3 > > AIX 4.3