Re: update: meta data in Pod Block

2022-01-03 Thread Richard Hainsworth
use Test; plan 8; my $p = 0; my $r; =begin pod =for DESCRIPTION :title = :authorBrown> :pubdate(2011) =end pod $r = $=pod[$p++].contents[0]; is $r.config, 'presentation template'; is $r.config, 'John Brown'; is $r.config, 2011; =begin pod =for head1 :attr('key&

Re: update: meta data in Pod Block

2022-01-02 Thread Ralph Mellor
On Sun, Jan 2, 2022 at 8:00 PM Richard Hainsworth wrote: > > What does not work (in that 'newkey' is not found in the 'config' part > of the Pod::Block returned by $=pod > > =head1 :key > > = :newkey I just tried that with Rakudo v2031.03 and got a com

update: meta data in Pod Block

2022-01-02 Thread Richard Hainsworth
has not been implemented. This is wrong in some way, either the implementation is incorrect, or the documentation is incorrect. But config data CAN be supplied on succeeding lines. What does not work (in that 'newkey' is not found in the 'config' part of the Pod::Block r

Re: pod questions

2021-07-19 Thread Tom Browder
the other questions? > Regarding the other questions: 1. I believe there are no reserved words for the '=begin/=end comment'. However, nested comments I believe were an issue at one time but they aren't now. 3. That depends on what you're doing. For example, currently the

Re: pod questions

2021-07-19 Thread Tom Browder
On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 06:57 Marcel Timmerman wrote: Reading a bit, I came across old documents (with a warning that these are > out of date) https://design.raku.org/S02.html#Multiline_Comments . It > states that any unrecognized format name should be treated as a comment > block, which the abov

pod questions

2021-07-19 Thread Marcel Timmerman
can find the test code when I process the pod data. The tag added to begin will not pose a problem. I need the code section to keep the newlines in. The problem now is when one needs to render other pod data to html or markdown, this part comes with it like shown the next markdown output

Re: impact of compiling pod doc

2020-07-14 Thread Marcel Timmerman
Thank you for answer JJ. It is quite a work to split such a large file up so I thought I'd better ask before I dive in head first. Later I might think it over. I have this documentation on the github pages too so I could separate the pod doc and keep them somewhere else where they won&

Re: impact of compiling pod doc

2020-07-14 Thread JJ Merelo
s 14:20, Marcel Timmerman () escribió: > Hi, > > I was wondering if pod documentation has a large impact on compiling > modules. I assume on small files it would be ignorable but I have some > modules which have grown big, one has 7153 lines of which the biggest > part is pod doc. W

impact of compiling pod doc

2020-07-14 Thread Marcel Timmerman
Hi, I was wondering if pod documentation has a large impact on compiling modules. I assume on small files it would be ignorable but I have some modules which have grown big, one has 7153 lines of which the biggest part is pod doc. Would it be useful to split such a file in two. one for code

Re: question on pod comments

2020-05-30 Thread ToddAndMargo via perl6-users
On 2020-05-30 21:28, Kevin Pye wrote: While the original documentation you were referring to called them Pod comments, that's not really accurate. The full documentation (to which I referred you) calls them "Pod documents" which is much more descriptive. The Pod document is p

Re: question on pod comments

2020-05-30 Thread Kevin Pye
While the original documentation you were referring to called them Pod comments, that's not really accurate. The full documentation (to which I referred you) calls them "Pod documents" which is much more descriptive. The Pod document is parsed by Rakudo, and the contents can be used

Re: question on pod comments

2020-05-30 Thread ToddAndMargo via perl6-users
t;> wrote: >> >> Hi All, >> >> I am somewhat confused about pod comments: >> >> https://docs.raku.org/language/syntax#Pod_comments >> >> Seems pretty straight forward. But when I look at >

Re: question on pod comments

2020-05-30 Thread Kevin Pye
>> > >> Hi All, > >> > >> I am somewhat confused about pod comments: > >> > >> https://docs.raku.org/language/syntax#Pod_comments > >> > >> Seems pretty straight forward. But when I look at > >> &

Re: question on pod comments

2020-05-30 Thread ToddAndMargo via perl6-users
On Sun, 31 May 2020 at 12:43, ToddAndMargo via perl6-users mailto:perl6-us...@perl.org>> wrote: Hi All, I am somewhat confused about pod comments: https://docs.raku.org/language/syntax#Pod_comments Seems pretty straight forward. But when I look at https://gith

Re: question on pod comments

2020-05-30 Thread Kevin Pye
They're not Pod comments, they're Pod abbreviated blocks: https://docs.raku.org/language/pod Kevin. On Sun, 31 May 2020 at 12:43, ToddAndMargo via perl6-users < perl6-us...@perl.org> wrote: > Hi All, > > I am somewhat confused about pod comments: > > https:

question on pod comments

2020-05-30 Thread ToddAndMargo via perl6-users
Hi All, I am somewhat confused about pod comments: https://docs.raku.org/language/syntax#Pod_comments Seems pretty straight forward. But when I look at https://github.com/tadzik/perl6-Config-INI/blob/master/lib/Config/INI.pm starting line 45, I see =begin pod =head1 NAME =head1 SYNOPSIS

Re: POD: linking to a module

2019-01-16 Thread Vadim Belman
> Wouldn't it be useful if Vadim commented on an appropriate GH issue? > If so, which would that be? > https://github.com/perl6/user-experience/issues/35 > <https://github.com/perl6/user-experience/issues/35> ? > https://github.com/perl6/Pod-To-HTML/issues/55 > <

Re: POD: linking to a module

2019-01-16 Thread Ralph Mellor
Hi JJ, Wouldn't it be useful if Vadim commented on an appropriate GH issue? If so, which would that be? https://github.com/perl6/user-experience/issues/35 ? https://github.com/perl6/Pod-To-HTML/issues/55 ? https://github.com/perl6/doc/issues/167 ? Somewhere else? -- raiph On Mon, Jan 14, 20

Re: POD: linking to a module

2019-01-13 Thread Vadim Belman
It can be used to define where the links > must point to. Something like: > > =config github:/user/module/tree/master/docs > > I'm not sure =config is implemented right now, my money is on NYI. And still > there's the problem that pod6 or pod-embedded-in-Perl6 is not rend

Re: POD: linking to a module

2019-01-13 Thread JJ Merelo
; directive. It can be used to define where the links must point to. > Something like: > > =config github:/user/module/tree/master/docs > I'm not sure =config is implemented right now, my money is on NYI. And still there's the problem that pod6 or pod-embedded-in-Perl6 is not re

Re: POD: linking to a module

2019-01-12 Thread Vadim Belman
some in gitlab... > > Any suggestion is welcome, meanwhile. > > El sáb., 12 ene. 2019 a las 2:22, Vadim Belman ( <mailto:vr...@lflat.org>>) escribió: > Hello, > > How do I properly write a link to a module in a POD documentation? Actually, > the question

Re: POD: linking to a module

2019-01-11 Thread JJ Merelo
nk to a module in a POD documentation? > Actually, the question is even more complex as it might be both a module > and a .pod. > > The documentation (https://docs.perl6.org/language/pod) isn't clear on > this subject. When it comes to `L<>` docs are mostly focused on URL

POD: linking to a module

2019-01-11 Thread Vadim Belman
Hello, How do I properly write a link to a module in a POD documentation? Actually, the question is even more complex as it might be both a module and a .pod. The documentation (https://docs.perl6.org/language/pod) isn't clear on this subject. When it comes to `L<>` docs are mostly

Re: Pod Types that are *NOT* Pod::Block

2018-10-16 Thread Tom Browder
On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 10:11 JJ Merelo > wrote: > Thanks for your answer, Tom. > You’re, welcome, JJ! -Tom

Re: Pod Types that are *NOT* Pod::Block

2018-10-16 Thread JJ Merelo
Thanks for your answer, Tom. El mar., 16 oct. 2018 a las 16:39, Tom Browder () escribió: > On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 08:55 Richard Hainsworth > wrote: > >> Tom >> I was trying not to bother you with all my questions 😁 >> > > Never a bother, Richard! > > How

Re: Pod Types that are *NOT* Pod::Block

2018-10-16 Thread Tom Browder
On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 08:55 Richard Hainsworth wrote: > Tom > I was trying not to bother you with all my questions 😁 > Never a bother, Richard! However I looked at all the classes of pod and they sub class block. So > which do not > Pod::Config and Pod::Raw I’ve not yet lo

Re: Pod Types that are *NOT* Pod::Block

2018-10-16 Thread Tom Browder
On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 00:31 Richard Hainsworth wrote: > In the type documentation for POD under Pod::Block it states: > > "Class for a Pod block, and base class for most other Pod classes." The pod classes that currently exist are in Rakudo repo rakudo/src/core/Pod.pm6. Na

Pod Types that are *NOT* Pod::Block

2018-10-15 Thread Richard Hainsworth
In the type documentation for POD under Pod::Block it states: "Class for a Pod block, and base class for most other Pod classes." 'most' means inter alia 'not all'. So this statement is saying that there are *other* Pod classes which are not Pod::Block. I

[perl #132632] [POD][NYI]. List and hash configuration value formats are not yet implemented (NYI)

2018-01-19 Thread Tom Browder via RT
closed also with tests in merged roast PR #371

[perl #130477] [BUG][POD] Pod config parses colopairs but simply stringifies whatever it matched

2018-01-19 Thread Tom Browder via RT
closed also with tests in merged roast PR #371

[perl #126742] [POD] config items should not include quotes for string values

2018-01-19 Thread Tom Browder via RT
closed also with tests in merged roast PR #371

[perl #124281] colonpairs in [POD] config options always produce strings

2018-01-19 Thread Tom Browder via RT
closed also with tests in merged roast PR #371

[perl #132632] [POD][NYI]. List and hash configuration value formats are not yet implemented (NYI)

2018-01-18 Thread Tom Browder via RT
closed by merge of rakudo PR #1339

[perl #130477] [BUG][POD] Pod config parses colopairs but simply stringifies whatever it matched

2018-01-18 Thread Tom Browder via RT
closed by merge of rakudo PR #1339

[perl #126742] [POD] config items should not include quotes for string values

2018-01-18 Thread Tom Browder via RT
closed by merge of rakudo PR #1339

[perl #124281] colonpairs in [POD] config options always produce strings

2018-01-18 Thread Tom Browder via RT
closed by merge of rakudo PR #1339

[perl #132650] [POD]=begin comment/=end comment blocks ought to nest

2017-12-24 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Tom Browder # Please include the string: [perl #132650] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=132650 > Given this nqp code: =begin comment some code ... =begin comment some

[perl #132632] [POD][NYI]. List and hash configuration value formats are not yet implemented (NYI)

2017-12-20 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Tom Browder # Please include the string: [perl #132632] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=132632 > The following pod configuration value formats are NYI: Type Exam

[perl #126740] [POD] Pod::Block::Table node caption property is not populated properly

2017-12-11 Thread Aleks-Daniel Jakimenko-Aleksejev via RT
, autarch wrote: > Given this code: > > =begin pod > > =begin table :caption('My caption') > > Title | Name | Size > == > Captain | Jane | Medium > Clerk | Bob | Large > > =end table > > =end pod > > dd $=pod[0]; >

[perl #127038] [POD] parsing does not create raw blocks

2017-12-03 Thread Timothy Smith via RT
On Sat, 26 Dec 2015 14:27:04 -0800, autarch wrote: > There's a class in rakudo's Pod.pm named Pod::Raw, but rakudo does not > produce these blocks. I'm not sure whether the bug is that the class > exists or that it's never used. I *think* it's meant to be Pod::B

[perl #125130] [BUG] cannot access pod blocks as a Hash

2017-12-02 Thread Aleks-Daniel Jakimenko-Aleksejev via RT
Still reproducible (2017.11,HEAD(e5b660e)) On 2015-05-07 04:43:49, FROGGS.de wrote: > =begin DATA␤foo␤=end DATA␤say $=pod > rakudo-moar 89c43c: OUTPUT«postcircumfix:<{ }> not defined for type > Array␤ in block at /tmp/xaDmKlMgSo:4␤␤» > > See also: https://github.com/perl6/

[perl #128221] [BUG] Weird internal error when parsing some very simple Pod with '-' in the first column of a table in Rakudo

2017-11-30 Thread Tom Browder via RT
tests added in roast PR #353

[perl #132348] [POD] tables should accept an inline comment (Z)

2017-11-30 Thread Tom Browder via RT
tests added in roast PR #353

[perl #132348] [POD] tables should accept an inline comment (Z)

2017-11-30 Thread Tom Browder via RT
tests added in roast PR #353

[perl #124403] [POD] Table parsing broken in rakudo

2017-11-30 Thread Tom Browder via RT
tests added in roast PR #353

[perl #129862] Pod::To::Text failing on uneven row lengths

2017-11-30 Thread Tom Browder via RT
Root problem is fixed by PR #1240.

[perl #132341] [POD] table handling should ensure table rows have the same number of cells even if they are empty

2017-11-30 Thread Tom Browder via RT
Fixed by PR #1240.

[perl #128221] [BUG] Weird internal error when parsing some very simple Pod with '-' in the first column of a table in Rakudo

2017-11-30 Thread Tom Browder via RT
Fixed by PR #1240.

[perl #132348] [POD] tables should accept an inline comment (Z)

2017-11-30 Thread Tom Browder via RT
Fixed by PR #1240.

[perl #124403] [POD] Table parsing broken in rakudo

2017-11-30 Thread Tom Browder via RT
Fixed by PR #1240.

Re: [perl #127020] [PERF] pod parsing memory is never freed

2017-11-27 Thread Lloyd Fournier
Probably one of a number of things that would be easy if we made pod another language on the braid :) On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 11:59 AM Timo Paulssen via RT < perl6-bugs-follo...@perl.org> wrote: > a look at a profile makes me suspect the problem is having > pod_string_character ma

Re: [perl #127020] [PERF] pod parsing memory is never freed

2017-11-27 Thread Lloyd Fournier via RT
Probably one of a number of things that would be easy if we made pod another language on the braid :) On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 11:59 AM Timo Paulssen via RT < perl6-bugs-follo...@perl.org> wrote: > a look at a profile makes me suspect the problem is having > pod_string_character ma

[perl #127020] [PERF] pod parsing memory is never freed

2017-11-26 Thread Timo Paulssen via RT
a look at a profile makes me suspect the problem is having pod_string_character match a single character at a time, causing rather large numbers of match objects for comparatively short strings. It's probably worthwhile to steal a piece of implementation from "nibbling", aka parsing strings. a

[perl #132377] [BUG][POD] tables inside =begin/=end comment pairs cause exception

2017-10-30 Thread Tom Browder via RT
On Mon, 30 Oct 2017 09:16:23 -0700, tbrowder wrote: > On Mon, 30 Oct 2017 08:21:04 -0700, tbrowder wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 09:53 Elizabeth Mattijsen wrote: > > > > > A —ll-exception stacktrace would be useful in such a case :-) > > > > > > WILCO! $ cat prob.p6 use v6; # an empty ta

[perl #132377] [BUG][POD] tables inside =begin/=end comment pairs cause exception

2017-10-30 Thread Tom Browder via RT
On Mon, 30 Oct 2017 08:21:04 -0700, tbrowder wrote: > On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 09:53 Elizabeth Mattijsen wrote: > > > A —ll-exception stacktrace would be useful in such a case :-) > > > WILCO! Expected "=end comment" to terminate "=begin comment"; found "=end table" instead. at SETTING::s

Re: [perl #132377] [BUG][POD] tables inside =begin/=end comment pairs cause exception

2017-10-30 Thread Tom Browder
On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 09:53 Elizabeth Mattijsen wrote: > A —ll-exception stacktrace would be useful in such a case :-) WILCO!

Re: [perl #132377] [BUG][POD] tables inside =begin/=end comment pairs cause exception

2017-10-30 Thread Tom Browder via RT
On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 09:53 Elizabeth Mattijsen wrote: > A —ll-exception stacktrace would be useful in such a case :-) WILCO!

Re: [perl #132377] [BUG][POD] tables inside =begin/=end comment pairs cause exception

2017-10-30 Thread Elizabeth Mattijsen
issue. > # https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=132377 > > > > The following pod causes an exception > > =begin comment > =begin table > a | b | c > =end table > =end comment > > If the =begin/=end table lines are indented by one space the exception is > not thrown

Re: [perl #132377] [BUG][POD] tables inside =begin/=end comment pairs cause exception

2017-10-30 Thread Elizabeth Mattijsen via RT
issue. > # https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=132377 > > > > The following pod causes an exception > > =begin comment > =begin table > a | b | c > =end table > =end comment > > If the =begin/=end table lines are indented by one space the exception is > not thrown

[perl #132377] [BUG][POD] tables inside =begin/=end comment pairs cause exception

2017-10-30 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Tom Browder # Please include the string: [perl #132377] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=132377 > The following pod causes an exception =begin comment =begin table a | b | c =end ta

[perl #132348] [BUG]. Pod tables should accept an inline comment (Z)

2017-10-22 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Tom Browder # Please include the string: [perl #132348] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=132348 > The following table causes an exception: =begin table some cells Z =end table

[perl #132339] [REGRESSION] =SEE-ALSO pod comment can no longer be parsed (=SEE-ALSO foo)

2017-10-21 Thread Aleks-Daniel Jakimenko-Aleksejev via RT
And also: https://github.com/tadzik/perl6-Acme-Meow/blob/35286b14447d22516fbf68767c4d7e18b7396971/lib/Acme/Meow.pm#L65-L69 https://github.com/skids/perl6-Control-Bail/blob/3e6ab6c3bab9176a44476bd0883ba99205306400/lib/Control/Bail.pm6#L81 https://github.com/tadzik/Grammar-BNF/blob/14f51ca5882f00f0ac

[perl #132339] [REGRESSION] =SEE-ALSO pod comment can no longer be parsed (=SEE-ALSO foo)

2017-10-21 Thread Aleks-Daniel Jakimenko-Aleksejev via RT
Just for the record, there was another module affected by this: https://github.com/nkh/P6-Text-Template/blob/5e1752c08ddb064e366be862fd500c4de0c4b833/lib/Text/Template.pm#L142 On 2017-10-21 10:44:51, c...@zoffix.com wrote: > On Sat, 21 Oct 2017 09:06:24 -0700, alex.jakime...@gmail.com wrote: > > C

[perl #132341] [BUG] Pod 6 table handling should ensure table rows have the same number of cells even if they are empty

2017-10-21 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Tom Browder # Please include the string: [perl #132341] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=132341 > Consider the following pod 6 tables: =begin table a | b | c m | n | o x | y =end ta

[perl #132339] [REGRESSION] =SEE-ALSO pod comment can no longer be parsed (=SEE-ALSO foo)

2017-10-21 Thread Zoffix Znet via RT
On Sat, 21 Oct 2017 09:06:24 -0700, alex.jakime...@gmail.com wrote: > Code: > =SEE-ALSO foo > > > ¦«2017.09,963a0f0657^»: > > > ¦«963a0f0,HEAD(312cac7)»: > ===SORRY!=== Error while compiling /tmp/8cNEnQJfmq > Preceding context expects a term, but found infix = instead > at /tmp/8cNEnQJfmq:1 > -

[perl #132339] [REGRESSION] =SEE-ALSO pod comment can no longer be parsed (=SEE-ALSO foo)

2017-10-21 Thread Zoffix Znet via RT
On Sat, 21 Oct 2017 09:06:24 -0700, alex.jakime...@gmail.com wrote: > Code: > =SEE-ALSO foo > > > ¦«2017.09,963a0f0657^»: > > > ¦«963a0f0,HEAD(312cac7)»: > ===SORRY!=== Error while compiling /tmp/8cNEnQJfmq > Preceding context expects a term, but found infix = instead > at /tmp/8cNEnQJfmq:1 > -

[perl #132339] [REGRESSION] =SEE-ALSO pod comment can no longer be parsed (=SEE-ALSO foo)

2017-10-21 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Aleks-Daniel Jakimenko-Aleksejev # Please include the string: [perl #132339] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=132339 > Code: =SEE-ALSO foo ¦«2017.09,963a0f0657^»: ¦«963a0f0,HEAD(312cac

[perl6/specs] c2d66a: Try to fix pod

2017-07-10 Thread GitHub
v6d.pod Log Message: --- Try to fix pod

[perl6/specs] 030df4: Fix POD error

2017-07-05 Thread GitHub
v6d.pod Log Message: --- Fix POD error

[perl #131196] [POD/REGEX] #| Doesn't parse POD formatting

2017-04-23 Thread via RT
ing and not parse it, while it should just parse the POD formatting code. eg. #| this is I sub test(){}; say $=pod[0].leading; will result in "this is I" instead of "this is fine" or ["this is", Pod::FormattingCode{:type("C")}] or wh

Re: pod question

2017-03-01 Thread mt1957
On 03/01/2017 03:50 PM, Will Coleda wrote: Not true, '=for' is part of POD6. See below. If you're getting errors, it's helpful to reduce the example to a reasonably small bit of code that duplicates the same error; either you'll realize the issue as you remove unrelated bits of code, or you'll e

Re: pod question

2017-03-01 Thread Will Coleda
Not true, '=for' is part of POD6. See below. If you're getting errors, it's helpful to reduce the example to a reasonably small bit of code that duplicates the same error; either you'll realize the issue as you remove unrelated bits of code, or you'll end up with an example that epitomizes the pro

pod question

2017-03-01 Thread mt1957
Hi, Is it true that the '=for' is taken out of the pod language? I get errors when I use it. It should take the line and the next lines as a block. I've also seen that it has the same effect now when I don't use it. Regards, Marcel

[perl #130477] [BUG][POD] Pod config parses colopairs but simply stringifies whatever it matched

2016-12-31 Thread via RT
The rest all parse OK but the rest simply stringify whatever is inside the `()`: =begin table :foo('meow') :bar :ber(Q|foos|) :var(join "\n", ) The Bowler Carol PinnslerHaunted bowling ball =end table dd $=pod # [Pod::Block::Table.new(

[perl #129925] [POD] --doc renders N<> incorrectly

2016-10-20 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Will Coleda # Please include the string: [perl #129925] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=129925 > =begin pod BadN. =end pod renders as: Badthings are happening. While not spec

Re: [perl #129862] [BUG][POD] Pod::To::Text failing on uneven row lengths

2016-10-14 Thread Tom Browder
On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 8:32 PM, Zoffix Znet via RT wrote: > > PR merged[^1]; tests needed. > > [1] > https://github.com/rakudo/rakudo/commit/7af9ec9d90d4ec8e9732e979729df85a80f7ec11 See perl/roast PR 168.

[perl #129862] [BUG][POD] Pod::To::Text failing on uneven row lengths

2016-10-13 Thread Zoffix Znet via RT
string: [perl #129862] > > > # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this > > > issue. > > > # https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=129862 > > > > > > > > > > Consider pod.pl: > > > > > > =begin p

Re: [perl #129862] [BUG][POD] Pod::To::Text failing on uneven row lengths

2016-10-12 Thread Tom Browder
gt; > Consider pod.pl: > > =begin pod > > =begin table > a | b | c > l | m | n > x | y > =end table With the current state of rakudo ​ pod​ , ill-formed tables are problematic. Try redoing the table like this (adding the separator for the missing column, making the column s

[perl #129862] [BUG][POD] Pod::To::Text failing on uneven row lengths

2016-10-12 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by David Warring # Please include the string: [perl #129862] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=129862 > Consider pod.pl: =begin pod =begin table a | b | c l | m | n x | y =end table =

Re: [perl #128587] [POD] need pod-to-man translator

2016-07-12 Thread Patrick R. Michaud
On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 08:48:59AM -0500, Tom Browder wrote: > > If --help mentions a man page, it's probably sufficient to ship Rakudo > > with an already-translated man page, rather than shipping the translator. > >Very true--the voice of reason! > >But shouldn't all the pod6-to-X trans

Re: [perl #128587] [POD] need pod-to-man translator

2016-07-12 Thread Tom Browder
On Tuesday, July 12, 2016, Patrick R. Michaud wrote: > I think any pod2man translator program should be separate from Rakudo > itself. > > If --help mentions a man page, it's probably sufficient to ship Rakudo > with an already-translated man page, rather than shipping the translator. Very true

Re: [perl #128587] [POD] need pod-to-man translator

2016-07-12 Thread Patrick R. Michaud
I think any pod2man translator program should be separate from Rakudo itself. If --help mentions a man page, it's probably sufficient to ship Rakudo with an already-translated man page, rather than shipping the translator. Pm On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 04:34:00AM -0500, Tom Browder wrote: >On M

[perl #128587] [POD] need pod-to-man translator

2016-07-12 Thread Tom Browder
On Monday, July 11, 2016, Will Coleda via RT > wrote: > On Sat Jul 09 13:51:07 2016, tbrowder wrote: > > Need a pod2man translator. > Does this need to be shipped with the rakudo compiler? Since the perl6 program --help once mentioned the perl6 man page, maybe it should. -Tom

[perl #128587] [POD] need pod-to-man translator

2016-07-11 Thread Will Coleda via RT
On Sat Jul 09 13:51:07 2016, tbrowder wrote: > Need a pod2man translator. Does this need to be shipped with the rakudo compiler? -- Will "Coke" Coleda

[perl #128587] [POD] need pod-to-man translator

2016-07-09 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Tom Browder # Please include the string: [perl #128587] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=128587 > Need a pod2man translator.

[perl #128570] Pod numbered lists

2016-07-07 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Tom Browder # Please include the string: [perl #128570] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=128570 > >From irc #perl6 2016-07-06: [21:35] tbrowder: also right now there is no way to set/res

[perl #128569] Pod::Block needs a .parent attribute

2016-07-07 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Tom Browder # Please include the string: [perl #128569] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=128569 > >From irc #perl5, 2016-07-06: [21:28] tbrowder: if you are working on Pod::*

[perl #128221] [BUG] Weird internal error when parsing some very simple Pod with '-' in the first column of a table in Rakudo

2016-07-01 Thread Tom Browder via RT
I am working on this issue and would like ownership of it.

Re: NQP and Pod

2016-06-29 Thread Tom Browder
On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 9:00 AM, Will Coleda wrote: > On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 5:32 PM, Tom Browder wrote: >> I am trying to debug a P6 pod problem, and the problem code seems to be in >> file: >> >> rakudo/src/Perl6/Pod.nqp >> >> My question is how can

Re: NQP and Pod

2016-06-29 Thread Will Coleda
On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 5:32 PM, Tom Browder wrote: > I am trying to debug a P6 pod problem, and the problem code seems to be in > file: > > rakudo/src/Perl6/Pod.nqp > > My question is how can I access code in that file? > > + Can I write an nqp script, use the Perl6:

NQP and Pod

2016-06-28 Thread Tom Browder
I am trying to debug a P6 pod problem, and the problem code seems to be in file: rakudo/src/Perl6/Pod.nqp My question is how can I access code in that file? + Can I write an nqp script, use the Perl6::Pod module, and operate that way? + How do I feed a chunk of pod to the routines? Any help

[perl #128498] Pod 6 doesn't recognize '#' following "=headN" keywords per S26

2016-06-28 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Tom Browder # Please include the string: [perl #128498] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=128498 > According to S26, headings may be numbered in nested format: Alternatively, as a short-ha

[perl #128221] [BUG] Weird internal error when parsing some very simple Pod with '-' in the first column of a table in Rakudo

2016-05-23 Thread Carl Mäsak
# New Ticket Created by "Carl Mäsak" # Please include the string: [perl #128221] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=128221 > continuing my problems with p6 pod: I have scrubbed a bad pod file down

Re: pod: Missing semantic block

2016-05-16 Thread Parrot Raiser
wrote: > Hello! > > Add, please, semantic block "=EXAMPLES" to pod. > http://design.perl6.org/S26.html#Semantic_blocks > > Examples are very often missing in classical man pages. > > Thank you, > Hans >

Re: pod: Missing semantic block

2016-05-16 Thread Timo Paulssen
On 16/05/16 14:00, Hans Ginzel wrote: Hello! Add, please, semantic block "=EXAMPLES" to pod. http://design.perl6.org/S26.html#Semantic_blocks Examples are very often missing in classical man pages. Thank you, Hans Hello Hans, it says in the speculations that all uppercase block

pod: Missing semantic block

2016-05-16 Thread Hans Ginzel
Hello! Add, please, semantic block "=EXAMPLES" to pod. http://design.perl6.org/S26.html#Semantic_blocks Examples are very often missing in classical man pages. Thank you, Hans

Re: Some proposed Perl 6 pod projects for comment

2016-05-16 Thread Tom Browder
On Sunday, May 15, 2016, mt1957 wrote: > > Pod::To::PDF >> == >> >> Nice to have. It could use something like p6pod2latex as an >> intermediate filter and then use popular LaTeX tools to generate the PDF. > > At the moment I am writing pod6 in separa

Re: Some proposed Perl 6 pod projects for comment

2016-05-15 Thread mt1957
Hi Tom, Pod::To::PDF == Nice to have. It could use something like p6pod2latex as an intermediate filter and then use popular LaTeX tools to generate the PDF. At the moment I am writing pod6 in separate files with the following at the top of such a file. It needs wkhtmltopdf for this

Some proposed Perl 6 pod projects for comment

2016-05-14 Thread Tom Browder
I am enjoying the Perl 6 community and contributing tidbits to the docs. In working with the docs, in Pod 6, I think I see some worthwhile Perl 6 Pod projects that interest me, and I would appreciate any comments. (Note that the new program and module names are kind of lame and definitely need

Re: Perl 6 pod-handling code seems widely scattered

2016-04-27 Thread Moritz Lenz
On 04/25/2016 03:27 PM, Tadeusz Sośnierz wrote: On 25/04/16 14:13, Tom Browder wrote: I would like to hack on the pod handling code (particularly the HTML generation) but it seems to be quite scattered around github. Is http://github.com/perl6/Pod::To::HTML>> the definitive repo locati

  1   2   3   4   5   6   >