Re: PARROT QUESTIONS: The PDDs

2002-08-04 Thread Dan Sugalski
At 8:56 AM -0400 8/3/02, Bryan C. Warnock wrote: >Sorry for the Wayback Machine... > >On Mon, 2002-07-15 at 01:13, Ashley Winters wrote: >> I decided my next step should be to take a look at the PDDs so I know what's >> going on. I would expect them to be like a writer's canon for a TV >>show.

Re: PARROT QUESTIONS: The PDDs

2002-08-04 Thread Bryan C. Warnock
Sorry for the Wayback Machine... On Mon, 2002-07-15 at 01:13, Ashley Winters wrote: > I decided my next step should be to take a look at the PDDs so I know what's > going on. I would expect them to be like a writer's canon for a TV show. I'll > write my impressions as I go on. > > PDD00: > Doe

Re: PARROT QUESTIONS: The PDDs

2002-07-15 Thread David M. Lloyd
On Mon, 15 Jul 2002, Ashley Winters wrote: > PDD02: Common vtable format for all variables > Nice. I should be able to answer some of these. > Question: Why is the key param for keyed_int vtable functions a pointer? > Considering I have to implement all those functions to add a PMC... > seems o

PARROT QUESTIONS: The PDDs

2002-07-14 Thread Ashley Winters
I decided my next step should be to take a look at the PDDs so I know what's going on. I would expect them to be like a writer's canon for a TV show. I'll write my impressions as I go on. PDD00: Does PDD still mean 'Perl Design Document', or should it mean 'Parrot ...'? The documents seem to a