Sorry for the Wayback Machine... On Mon, 2002-07-15 at 01:13, Ashley Winters wrote: > I decided my next step should be to take a look at the PDDs so I know what's > going on. I would expect them to be like a writer's canon for a TV show. I'll > write my impressions as I go on. > > PDD00: > Does PDD still mean 'Perl Design Document', or should it mean 'Parrot ...'? > The documents seem to all refer to the interpreter. > > While I'm thinking about it, where will 'Parrot' leave off and 'Perl6' begin? > At some point, it will be inappropriate to discuss the Parrot interpreter on > a Perl6 list, since Perl6 might have JVM/CLR backends, and Parrot might have > Python/Ruby frontends.
These are both questions I asked a long time ago, for which I received no sufficient answers. So PDD 0, at least, remained as it was. >From a coding/design perspective, there was at least a thread starting at http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg03748.html As a matter of fact, looking at it more closely indicates that this was actually annotated with CVS version 1.2 of PDD 0. Original threads: http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg08677.html http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg08678.html As you can see, I was dilemma'd about it, too. :-) -- Bryan C. Warnock bwarnock@(gtemail.net|raba.com)
