> This check can be removed from default.pmc. Property values should not
> be returned by get_attr_str.
Done in r31509
On Mon Oct 22 09:34:51 2007, ptc wrote:
> In src/pmc/default.pmc:get_attr_str() there is the todo item:
>
> /* let's look for props first
> * XXX do we need that in the default object system?
>
> We require an answer to this question, and quite possibly further
> deve
or props first
* XXX do we need that in the default object system?
We require an answer to this question, and quite possibly further development
depending upon the answer.
Luke Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I notice that ParrotObject only has [get|set]_integer_keyed. I assume
> we intend to make those for the rest of the data types.
Yep. Albeit before continuing here filling the blanks, I'd really like
to have attribute naming/mangling clarified. The pmc doe
Since I'm working on a compiler that requires objects, and seeing as how
we have a python compiler now hanging over our heads, what work is
necessary to finish up the object system?
I notice that ParrotObject only has [get|set]_integer_keyed. I assume
we intend to make those for the rest o
