Luke Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I notice that ParrotObject only has [get|set]_integer_keyed. I assume > we intend to make those for the rest of the data types.
Yep. Albeit before continuing here filling the blanks, I'd really like to have attribute naming/mangling clarified. The pmc doesn't depend on that, but tests do :) > Also, in order to support anonymous classes, I'd like the method table > to be in the class object itself, as opposed to in mangled globals. Is > this also something I could tackle? Its again the problem of name mangling. Melvin's proposal WRT class syntax seems to imply, that imcc takes care of bundling methods with their classes, but I'm not sure, how the anonymous case will be done. > Thanks, > Luke leo
