Re: Licensing and source. READ ME, DAMMIT!

2001-12-05 Thread Dan Sugalski
At 04:25 AM 12/5/2001 -0500, James Mastros wrote: >On Tue, 4 Dec 2001, Dan Sugalski wrote: > > This also means no writing your own license terms for code you submit. > > ("Licensed under the same terms as perl" counts as writing your own...) >Umm, AFACS (Though AINAL, and ISGCBAP (I should get c

Re: Licensing and source. READ ME, DAMMIT!

2001-12-05 Thread James Mastros
On Tue, 4 Dec 2001, Dan Sugalski wrote: > This also means no writing your own license terms for code you submit. > ("Licensed under the same terms as perl" counts as writing your own...) Umm, AFACS (Though AINAL, and ISGCBAP (I should get caught by the acronym police) but "Under the same terms a

Licensing and source. READ ME, DAMMIT!

2001-12-04 Thread Dan Sugalski
Folks, We're nailing down the license finally for Parrot, and should have things set. Until then... DO NOT SUBMIT CODE THAT ISN'T YOURS! This *includes* from perl 5. (Like, say, the code in utf8.[ch]) If you didn't write it, or did but don't want to abide by the bits about licensing in the R