At 04:25 AM 12/5/2001 -0500, James Mastros wrote:
>On Tue, 4 Dec 2001, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> > This also means no writing your own license terms for code you submit.
> > ("Licensed under the same terms as perl" counts as writing your own...)
>Umm, AFACS (Though AINAL, and ISGCBAP (I should get caught by the acronym
>police) but "Under the same terms as _parrot_ should be fine.
If it's in the parrot distribution it ought not even *have* licensing terms
attached to it. That's what the package license is for...
Dan
--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski even samurai
[EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even
teddy bears get drunk
