Steve Fink wrote:
I didn't have the opportunity then, but I'm really wondering -- what
about this did NMAKE dislike? I still prefer the rebuild.pl method,
but I don't have nmake, so I can't beat it into submission.
The problem was, that the change dates of the dependend files are not
controllable
On Thu, Jul 10, 2003 at 08:47:08AM +0200, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> I have checked in a "final" solution for this never ending story.
>
> It replaces the bison/lex build line with:
>
>echo ... or REM ...
>
> by default.
>
> I have added a Configure option C<--maintainer> to enable the old
>
Michal Wallace <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But is there a better solution for first time
> users?
I have checked in a "final" solution for this never ending story.
It replaces the bison/lex build line with:
echo ... or REM ...
by default.
I have added a Configure option C<--maintainer> to
Michal Wallace wrote:
Hey all,
Basically, IMCC fails to build on a fresh CVS
checkout because of the dates on the imcparser.c
and imcparser.h files.
[ snip ]
http://nntp.x.perl.org/group/perl.perl6.internals/16419
I've changed my checkin scripts again, so that now the generated files
get tou
Hey all,
I've been following parrot for a while and finally
decided to try it out. Anyway, I ran into a snag.
Hopefully this is the right place to report this.
Basically, IMCC fails to build on a fresh CVS
checkout because of the dates on the imcparser.c
and imcparser.h files.
Looks like this
