On Sat, Aug 02, 2003 at 10:35:56AM +0100, Nicholas Clark wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 02, 2003 at 01:49:05AM -0400, David H. Adler wrote:
> > I'm sure it needs a few tweaks, but I've managed to write a hq9+
> > interpreter in pasm.
>
> > Any thoughts on this?
>
> + isn't a portable file name character is
On Sat, Aug 02, 2003 at 01:49:05AM -0400, David H. Adler wrote:
> I'm sure it needs a few tweaks, but I've managed to write a hq9+
> interpreter in pasm.
> Any thoughts on this?
+ isn't a portable file name character is it?
So although Unix (and CVS) will be quite happy, it would not be a great
i
I'm sure it needs a few tweaks, but I've managed to write a hq9+
interpreter in pasm.
[insert deity here] help us all. :-)
Any thoughts on this?
http://www.thetasigma.com/parrot/
dha
--
David H. Adler - <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - http://www.panix.com/~dha/
"It's all eggs, bacon, beans and a fried s