On Sat, Aug 02, 2003 at 01:49:05AM -0400, David H. Adler wrote: > I'm sure it needs a few tweaks, but I've managed to write a hq9+ > interpreter in pasm.
> Any thoughts on this? + isn't a portable file name character is it? So although Unix (and CVS) will be quite happy, it would not be a great idea naming a subdirectory hq9+ ? What should we call it prn.Im_told_CPM_still_has_its_claws_in_windows ? :-) Nicholas Clark
