Re: Fwd: Re: Tasks for the interested

2002-06-18 Thread Josh Wilmes
Oh man. Now i'm doomed. I guess i'll start playing tonight then ;-) --Josh At 17:20 on 06/18/2002 EDT, Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > At 5:10 PM -0400 6/18/02, Josh Wilmes wrote: > >So now who's going to implement it? (must..contain..urge..) > > You think *you* have to contain t

Re: Fwd: Re: Tasks for the interested

2002-06-18 Thread Dan Sugalski
At 5:10 PM -0400 6/18/02, Josh Wilmes wrote: >So now who's going to implement it? (must..contain..urge..) You think *you* have to contain the urge... :) Seriously, this is a good thing to tackle. Not only does it involve custom opcode libraries, but it also requires packfile loading with tran

Re: Fwd: Re: Tasks for the interested

2002-06-18 Thread Josh Wilmes
So now who's going to implement it? (must..contain..urge..) --Josh At 17:03 on 06/18/2002 EDT, Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> 6) Infocom's z-machine > > > >http://www.gnelson.demon.co.uk/zspec/sect14.html > > Well, that's one...

Fwd: Re: Tasks for the interested

2002-06-18 Thread Dan Sugalski
>Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2002 15:55:51 -0500 >From: Joe Mason >To: Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: Re: Tasks for the interested > > >On Tue, Jun 18, 2002 at 04:33:55PM -0400, Dan Sugalski wrote: >> Okay, here are some tasks for the interested. They're all related (I >> expect you'll see the