On Mon, 2003-09-29 at 14:50, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> Cool. I see it's GPL'd, which is fine, but I'm thinking it's time to start
> getting more formal with requiring licenses and noting ownership for stuff
> that goes into the parrot tree, so everyone can keep it straight and know
> what they're contr
On Mon, 29 Sep 2003, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> Marcus Thiesen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > BTW, I managed to write a urm.in for the Configure.pl script and made my
> > urmc package relative to the parrot root (assuming it in languages/urm).
> > Now it is completely integrated into the Parrot bu
Marcus Thiesen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> BTW, I managed to write a urm.in for the Configure.pl script and made my
> urmc package relative to the parrot root (assuming it in languages/urm).
> Now it is completely integrated into the Parrot build process and should
> be even more platform indepen
Marcus Thiesen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --=-7T7g/ui9TX4p7KWNi2Gq
> Content-Type: text/plain
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> Hi,
> I've been playing with Parrot for the last two days trying to get the
> disassembler working, but I was not very successful. As I mentioned
> earli
Hi,
I've been playing with Parrot for the last two days trying to get the
disassembler working, but I was not very successful. As I mentioned
earlier in my patch email there were some issues in the debug.c file due
to some uninitialized variables. The second SEGFAULT I get happens due
to some stra
