On Mon, 2003-09-29 at 14:50, Dan Sugalski wrote: > Cool. I see it's GPL'd, which is fine, but I'm thinking it's time to start > getting more formal with requiring licenses and noting ownership for stuff > that goes into the parrot tree, so everyone can keep it straight and know > what they're contributing to. (Parrot proper's AL/GPL owned by TPF, some > of languages is GPL with copyrights owned by various people, ICU is > something else entirely and IBM's, and we really need to keep this > straight)
Actually you got this file RESPONSIBLE_PARTIES which notes down some of
this stuff.
For the languages I would recommend something like a required MAINTAINER
file in every language dir that tells who is actively maintaining the
stuff and a list in language/ that tells owner, license, maintainer or
something.
Have fun,
Marcus
--
---------------------------------------------------------
|Marcus Thiesen ICQ# 108989768|
---------------------------------------------------------
| www.thiesenweb.de |
---------------------------------------------------------
28A7 37CC AE2C BB6C D56D 8A3D E614 E56B 7546 75F2
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
