At 11:19 AM -0800 3/29/02, Steve Fink wrote:
>On Thu, Mar 28, 2002 at 12:18:48AM -0500, Michel J Lambert wrote:
>> Attached are my revised files. pbc2c.pl uses Parrot::OpTrans::Compiled,
>> and this patch uses Parrot::OpTrans::CGoto. It also fixed the issues with
>> the last patch:
>>
>> - rem
On Thu, Mar 28, 2002 at 12:18:48AM -0500, Michel J Lambert wrote:
> Attached are my revised files. pbc2c.pl uses Parrot::OpTrans::Compiled,
> and this patch uses Parrot::OpTrans::CGoto. It also fixed the issues with
> the last patch:
>
> - removed inadvertant keyed commenting
> - fixed #include n
Attached are my revised files. pbc2c.pl uses Parrot::OpTrans::Compiled,
and this patch uses Parrot::OpTrans::CGoto. It also fixed the issues with
the last patch:
- removed inadvertant keyed commenting
- fixed #include name
- fixed pbc2c.pl
- should have unix line endings
Please let me know if th
to subclass the other (or pull out a common superclass); I
don't know.
> Problems with my patch:
> + includes a commenting-out of the keyed function. That probably should
> not be in this computed-goto patch.
I just submitted a patch that may conflict with this, that makes the
keyed stu
h my patch:
+ includes a commenting-out of the keyed function. That probably should
not be in this computed-goto patch.
+ no changes to pbc2c.pl should be required. Those changes should be made
into a seperate 'indenting' patch.
+ misnamed the #include'd file in runops_cores.c
I'll wait on the issue of pbc2c.pl before I submit a revised patch.
Thanks for looking into this,
Mike Lambert
On Wed, Mar 27, 2002 at 02:55:59AM -0500, Michel J Lambert wrote:
> Attached is a patch to implement computed-goto on gcc, taken from the
> original post by Daniel Grunblatt:
> http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg06255.html
The patch is slightly broken, core_cg_ops.h in interpreter.c versus
core_ops_cg.h e
Melvin Smith:
> Simon is on vacation and may or may
> not be doing anything with assembler, keyed aggregate, etc.
I'm not on vacation yet. :) I'm not doing any more work on the assembler, but
I'm leaving it to Jeff to decide whether or not to apply it. I think
packfile.c will need updating when/i
At 03:16 AM 3/27/2002 -0500, Michel J Lambert wrote:
>Doh, sorry about that.
>
>If it makes you feel any better (or worse), I was in the midst of writing
>up the email for fixing the pushp bug you mentioned, when up pops '[PATCH]
>Stack fix' in my email inbox, turning my local bug fix into a nice
At 12:16 AM 3/27/2002 -0800, Brent Dax wrote:
>Melvin Smith:
># At 02:55 AM 3/27/2002 -0500, Michel J Lambert wrote:
># >Attached is a patch to implement computed-goto on gcc, taken from the
># Right now most of us have no clue whos doing what anymore besides Dan
># doing GC, Jeff doing unicode, S
CTED]>
> To: Michel J Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Computed-goto Patch
>
> At 02:55 AM 3/27/2002 -0500, Michel J Lambert wrote:
> >Attached is a patch to implement computed-goto on gcc, taken from the
>
> Wow, talk about timing, I was up
Melvin Smith:
# At 02:55 AM 3/27/2002 -0500, Michel J Lambert wrote:
# >Attached is a patch to implement computed-goto on gcc, taken from the
#
# Wow, talk about timing, I was up late working on computed goto core
# just now, and had hacked ops2c.pl and CGoto.pm. I had to remove
# prederef stuff u
At 02:55 AM 3/27/2002 -0500, Michel J Lambert wrote:
>Attached is a patch to implement computed-goto on gcc, taken from the
Wow, talk about timing, I was up late working on computed goto core
just now, and had hacked ops2c.pl and CGoto.pm. I had to remove
prederef stuff until I could look at it.
Attached is a patch to implement computed-goto on gcc, taken from the
original post by Daniel Grunblatt:
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg06255.html
Changes since his original patch:
+ works with the current codebase
+ handles all jumps properly, and passes all tests (I'm not sure,
but I don't believe t
13 matches
Mail list logo
