Doh, sorry about that. If it makes you feel any better (or worse), I was in the midst of writing up the email for fixing the pushp bug you mentioned, when up pops '[PATCH] Stack fix' in my email inbox, turning my local bug fix into a nice learning exercise. :)
I think you bring up a good point about helping to maintain who's doing what as the parrot development group of people grows larger. Isn't this what bugs6.perl.org was supposed to be for? Mike Lambert Melvin Smith wrote: > Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2002 03:08:18 -0500 > From: Melvin Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Michel J Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Computed-goto Patch > > At 02:55 AM 3/27/2002 -0500, Michel J Lambert wrote: > >Attached is a patch to implement computed-goto on gcc, taken from the > > Wow, talk about timing, I was up late working on computed goto core > just now, and had hacked ops2c.pl and CGoto.pm. I had to remove > prederef stuff until I could look at it. > > I was 90% there, then your patch popped up... ouch :) > > I guess I could have asked on the list first. > > In any case, Good work! > > We DO need a file in the repository that has a status of things that > are implemented, implemented but reworking, partly implemented > and on the drawing board, and who might be working on said > area. > > Right now most of us have no clue whos doing what anymore besides Dan > doing GC, Jeff doing unicode, Simon is on vacation and may or may > not be doing anything with assembler, keyed aggregate, etc. > > -Melvin > >
