On Fri, 2004-04-30 at 05:48, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> If it alters the way things look to bytecode, just make sure to
> update the docs and patch up the existing wrapping libraries.
I'll take a look at Leo's new docs and patch everything with an
offending signature in src/call_list.txt.
Anyone who
Chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Following up on the idea Leo and I discussed this morning, here's a
> patch that expects integer out parameters to be wrapped in some sort of
> INTVALy PMCs.
Thanks, applied + changed '2' and '4' too + JIT/i386.
leo
Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If it alters the way things look to bytecode, just make sure to
> update the docs and patch up the existing wrapping libraries.
Docs are adapted. Needed code changes:
old for signature "i3i":
I5 = arg1
I6 = arg2
new
new P5, .PerlInt
P5 = arg1
At 7:44 AM +0200 4/30/04, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Following up on the idea Leo and I discussed this morning, here's a
patch that expects integer out parameters to be wrapped in some sort of
INTVALy PMCs.
This solves my problem rather nicely.
Good. As soon as
Chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Following up on the idea Leo and I discussed this morning, here's a
> patch that expects integer out parameters to be wrapped in some sort of
> INTVALy PMCs.
> This solves my problem rather nicely.
Good. As soon as we have Dan's ok and I'll have JIT adapted
# New Ticket Created by chromatic
# Please include the string: [perl #29261]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org:80/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=29261 >
Following up on the idea Leo and I discussed this morning, here's a
patch that expects i
