Chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Following up on the idea Leo and I discussed this morning, here's a patch that expects integer out parameters to be wrapped in some sort of INTVALy PMCs.
This solves my problem rather nicely.
Good. As soon as we have Dan's ok and I'll have JIT adapted too, it'll go in.
Works for me. I was going to have you guys work out what you need and put it in, but you've beaten me to it. :)
If it alters the way things look to bytecode, just make sure to update the docs and patch up the existing wrapping libraries.
--
Dan
--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski even samurai
[EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even
teddy bears get drunk
