Re: [PATCH] class/*.c weren't being compiled with warnings turned on.

2002-01-15 Thread Dan Sugalski
At 04:39 PM 1/15/2002 +, Alex Gough wrote: >On Tue, 15 Jan 2002, Simon Glover wrote: > > >warning: control reaches end of non-void function > > > > I'm not sure what to do about the former. The latter generally seem to > > arise from unimplemented methods. Accordingly, I've added a new >

Re: [PATCH] class/*.c weren't being compiled with warnings turned on. [APPLIED]

2002-01-15 Thread Dan Sugalski
At 11:17 PM 1/14/2002 +, Nicholas Clark wrote: >On Sun, Jan 13, 2002 at 02:14:08PM -0500, Dan Sugalski wrote: > > So, I'm turning off the unused parameter warning for now to shut the .ops > > file compiles up. After that point, all submitted patches must generate no > > more warnings than were

[PATCH] class/*.c weren't being compiled with warnings turned on.

2002-01-14 Thread Nicholas Clark
On Sun, Jan 13, 2002 at 02:14:08PM -0500, Dan Sugalski wrote: > So, I'm turning off the unused parameter warning for now to shut the .ops > file compiles up. After that point, all submitted patches must generate no > more warnings than were currently being generated, and all submitted > patches