At 7:11 PM +0100 3/22/04, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Sterling Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mar 22, 2004, at 11:42 AM, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
* end is now inserted in @MAIN if missing
perhaps this should be a compiler warning instead?
If both C<@MAIN> and C are missing, we could compile a
Sterling Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mar 22, 2004, at 11:42 AM, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
>> * end is now inserted in @MAIN if missing
> perhaps this should be a compiler warning instead?
If both C<@MAIN> and C are missing, we could compile a module. So
sometimes you'll get a warning an
On Mar 22, 2004, at 11:42 AM, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
* end is now inserted in @MAIN if missing
perhaps this should be a compiler warning instead?
-sterling
* end is now inserted in @MAIN if missing
* in @MAIN P1 isn't moved around
* -Oc: replace savetop with up to 3 pushtopX ops
It's a good idea to declare the main function:
.sub _main @MAIN
...
.end
leo
