Sterling Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mar 22, 2004, at 11:42 AM, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
>> * end is now inserted in @MAIN if missing > perhaps this should be a compiler warning instead? If both C<@MAIN> and C<end> are missing, we could compile a module. So sometimes you'll get a warning and sometimes not. Not good IMHO. Inserting C<end> in C<@main> matches the automatically inserted C<invoke P1> in subs. > -sterling leo
