Re: Packfile writing bug

On Wed, Nov 30, 2005 at 08:05:09AM -0800, jerry gay wrote: > On 11/30/05, Peter Sinnott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 30, 2005 at 03:49:36PM -, Jonathan Worthington wrote: > > > OK, attached. If you run this as a PIR example, it works just fine. If >

Re: Packfile writing bug

On Wed, Nov 30, 2005 at 03:49:36PM -, Jonathan Worthington wrote: > OK, attached. If you run this as a PIR example, it works just fine. If > you compile it to a PBC, then you get the error. > > $ parrot breaks2.pir example.dll > > $ parrot -o breaks2.pbc breaks2.pir > > $ parrot breaks2.p

Re: [perl #36098] Solaris - Large number of tests fail under jit

On Thu, Oct 06, 2005 at 02:03:45AM -0700, Joshua Hoblitt via RT wrote: > On Wed, Oct 05, 2005 at 01:45:24AM -0700, Peter Sinnott via RT wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 04, 2005 at 09:04:57PM -0700, Joshua Hoblitt via RT wrote: > > > > I do not have access to the same machine any long

Re: [perl #36098] Solaris - Large number of tests fail under jit

On Tue, Oct 04, 2005 at 09:04:57PM -0700, Joshua Hoblitt via RT wrote: I do not have access to the same machine any longer so I have retested with solaris 2.8 , gcc 3.2.1 and the 2005-10-05_071500 parrot snapshot. This fails during make with the following perl -e 'chdir shift @ARGV; system q{make

Re: [perl #22873] perldoc -U vs. perldoc -u

On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 01:43:02AM -1000, Joshua Hoblitt wrote: > On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 11:31:17AM +0100, Peter Sinnott wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 08:43:41PM -0700, Joshua Hoblitt via RT wrote: > > > Does anyone have an old enough Perl to test if this is still an issue?

Re: [perl #22873] perldoc -U vs. perldoc -u

On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 08:43:41PM -0700, Joshua Hoblitt via RT wrote: > Does anyone have an old enough Perl to test if this is still an issue? > > -J > > -- parrot no longer supports perl 5.005 (from lib/Parrot/Revision.pm ) package Parrot::Revision; use strict; use 5.006; If I replace our

Re: loadlib and libraries with '.' in the name

On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 02:12:49PM +0100, Piers Cawley wrote: > Joshua Juran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Sep 23, 2005, at 3:47 AM, Leopold Toetsch wrote: > > > > > any time soon. You're welcome to write your own summaries that do use the full

Re: [perl #36086] FreeBSD t/op/trans.t failure when running with jit

On Thu, Jun 02, 2005 at 11:29:36AM +0200, Leopold Toetsch wrote: > Peter Sinnott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > When running t/op/trans.t using the jit it fails. When not > > using jit it passes > > > I think the problem may be with the macro as > > hmm, but

Re: HP-UX build notes

On Thu, Jun 02, 2005 at 11:22:45AM +0100, Nick Glencross wrote: > Peter Sinnott wrote: > > >bash-2.05$ uname -a > > > >HP-UX gnbil2dv B.11.00 A 9000/800 1657309373 two-user license > >bash-2.05$ /cm/tools/bin/perl -V > >Summary of my perl5 (revision 5.0 v

Re: HP-UX build notes

On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 10:48:32PM +0100, Nick Glencross wrote: > Leopold Toetsch wrote: > > >Nick Glencross wrote: > > > >>#define PARROT_9000/800 1 > > > > ^ > > > >Can you check in config/*/*.pl where that is coming from? > > That would be PARROT_${jitcpu}, where jitcpu is

Re: Monthly Release Schedule

On Thu, Apr 07, 2005 at 10:59:41AM -0400, Jeff Horwitz wrote: > On Thu, 7 Apr 2005, MrJoltCola wrote: > > > Where did Tinderbox go anyway? I don't mind running a tinderclient at all. > > i ran a tinderclient on my ultra 60 for a while before the tinderbox went > away. i think i was the only sola

Re: [perl #34617] builtin namesspaces issue - t/pmc/object-meths_28.imc && t/pmc/object-meths_28.imc

On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 11:44:01AM +0200, Leopold Toetsch wrote: > Peter Sinnott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Failed Test Stat Wstat Total Fail Failed List of Failed > > --- >

Re: Another Perl Task: review PMC compiler

On Fri, Mar 25, 2005 at 11:31:58AM +0100, Leopold Toetsch wrote: > Matt Diephouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Seems to be another ordering problem, where a hash is used instead of an > >> array with inherited vtable methods. pylong.dump has already

Re: Parrot 0.1.2 with MinGW32 (some experimets)

On Fri, Mar 11, 2005 at 11:26:09AM +0100, Leopold Toetsch wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >Strangely all the tests ( well pyclass pycomplex and pyfunc so far ) > >pass on freebsd but do so > > very very slowly and parrot is eating memory like there is no tomorrow. > >Gets above 300meg during

Re: Parrot 0.1.2 with MinGW32 (some experimets)

On Fri, Mar 11, 2005 at 10:19:55AM +0100, Leopold Toetsch wrote: > Matt Diephouse wrote: > >On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 22:23:07 +0100, Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >wrote: > > > >>Matt Diephouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >> > >>>Some of these same tests are failing on debian, fedora, and

Re: [perl #24168] gmake required to build imcc on freebsd

On Fri, Feb 04, 2005 at 11:44:14AM -0500, Andy Dougherty wrote: > On Thu, 4 Feb 2005, Will Coleda via RT wrote: > > > This is still the case. Documented in PLATFORMS, closing ticket. > > > > > [psinno - Thu Oct 09 02:45:59 2003]: > > > > > > Hi, > > >currently gmake seems to be required to bui

Re: Win XP problems

On Mon, Nov 08, 2004 at 12:56:50PM +0100, Leopold Toetsch wrote: > Christian Lott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I have Active State Perl. I have MSVC. I have the POW version of Parrot. > > What is POW? Parrot on Windows? Who does maintain it? > Possily he means http://www.jwcs.net/developers/per

Re: Install-Problem

On Thu, Oct 28, 2004 at 04:49:26PM +0530, Vijay D. wrote: > > I left the make for overnight :) > Here is the error I got.. > > xx.c > cc -I/usr/local/include -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 > -I/usr/includ > e/gdbm -g -Dan_Sugalski -Larry -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes > -Wmissing-prototyp

Re: This week's summary

On Thu, Sep 23, 2004 at 09:12:32AM -0400, Buddha Buck wrote: > On Wed, 22 Sep 2004 21:11:02 +0100, The Perl 6 Summarizer > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The Perl 6 Summary for the week ending 2004-09-17 > >Another week, another summary, and I'm running late. So: > > > > This week in perl6-com

Re: [perl #28916] gmake

On Mon, Apr 19, 2004 at 02:46:20AM -0700, Jeff Clites wrote: > On Apr 17, 2004, at 1:47 PM, Nicholas Clark (via RT) wrote: > > ># New Ticket Created by Nicholas Clark > ># Please include the string: [perl #28916] > ># in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. > ># http:/

Re: [CVS ci] PLATFORMS

On Thu, Feb 26, 2004 at 09:29:59AM +0100, Leopold Toetsch wrote: > Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Please help me fill out the blanks by sending or committing patches. > > Please make sure to have the latest and best Parrot from CVS. > > Still a lot of platforms missing. Please ...

Re: [perl #24333] [PATCH] pthreads configure on FreeBSD

On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 01:25:51PM +, Lars Balker Rasmussen wrote: > # New Ticket Created by Lars Balker Rasmussen > # Please include the string: [perl #24333] > # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. > # http://rt.perl.org/rt2/Ticket/Display.html?id=24333 > >

HP-UX test failures

Hi there, Now seeming like a reasonable time I decided to take parrot for a test ride of HPUX. There seem to be a few problems both with IO(these seem to be also happening on linux) and objects. bash$ perl t/pmc/io.t 1..20 Useless use of a constant in void context at t/pmc/io.t line 108. ok 1 -

Re: HP-UX test failures

On Fri, Sep 19, 2003 at 02:10:52PM +0200, H.Merijn Brand wrote: > On Fri 19 Sep 2003 14:05, Peter Sinnott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi there, > > > > Now seeming like a reasonable time I decided to > > take parrot for a test ride of HPUX. There seem to &

HP-UX test failures

Hi there, Now seeming like a reasonable time I decided to take parrot for a test ride of HPUX. There seem to be a few problems with objects. bash$ perl t/pmc/objects.t 1..4 ok 1 - findclass (base class) not ok 2 - findclass (subclass) # Failed test (t/pmc/objects.t at line 22) # got:

Re: Tinderboxens

On Mon, Jul 21, 2003 at 05:57:35PM -0700, Zach Lipton wrote: > On 7/18/03 8:36 PM, "Joshua Hoblitt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > [SNIP] [SNIP] > > Btw - Are there any specific platforms you'd like to see added? > I'd like to see a *BSD box if anyone has one they could use (it's not a > signifi

Re: perl6 on HP-UX 11.00

On Thu, Sep 26, 2002 at 07:25:09PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Do you have a working Perl6Grammar: > > $ perl6 -vwk -e'print qq(Hello parrot\n)' > P6C '__eval__' > .../imcc/imcc -verbose-o__eval__.pasm __eval__.imc > Reading __eval__.imc > using optimization '0' > assembly module _

Re: perl6 on HP-UX 11.00

On Thu, Sep 26, 2002 at 12:14:46PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > At 5:05 PM +0200 9/26/02, H.Merijn Brand wrote: > > > >perl t/harness > >t/builtins/array.Can't bless non-reference value at > >../../assemble.pl line 163. > > Hrm. What version of perl are you running? Hi, I just

Re: [perl #16874] [BUG] Concatenation failing

On Fri, Aug 30, 2002 at 08:35:43AM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > # New Ticket Created by Leon Brocard > # Please include the string: [perl #16874] > # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. > # http://rt.perl.org/rt2/Ticket/Display.html?id=16874 > > > > Hi. >