On Thu, Jun 02, 2005 at 11:22:45AM +0100, Nick Glencross wrote: > Peter Sinnott wrote: > > >bash-2.05$ uname -a > > > >HP-UX gnbil2dv B.11.00 A 9000/800 1657309373 two-user license > >bash-2.05$ /cm/tools/bin/perl -V > >Summary of my perl5 (revision 5.0 version 8 subversion 0) configuration: > >Platform: > >osname=hpux, osvers=11.00, archname=PA-RISC2.0 > >uname='hp-ux cmhp01 b.11.00 a 9000800 131901507 two-user license ' > > > > > > > >>I guess that just doing a s|/|_|g would be a good start. > >> > >>When I get access, I'll also see if the alignment test hangs as one of > >>the comments suggests, or whether I get a meaningful value returned. > >> > >> > >> > > > >>From cvs : > >Determining your minimum pointer alignment..............for hpux: 4 bytes. > > > > > >With hpux hard code commented out : > >Determining your minimum pointer alignment........................ 4 bytes. > > > > > >The comment in the hardcode says it is for HP-UX 10.20 so maybe 11 never > >hung. Same answer anyway so no harm done(probably) > > > Great! That saves me doing tomorrow's experiment. Have you done a build > to see if you get similar behaviour to me?
Alas my attempts to build fail at the link stage. gcc 2.95 fails as stuff isn't compiled correctly with position independent code and nothing I try with fpic/fPIC/shared will please it. gcc 3.3 fails saying there are references to variables that do not exist and the variable looks like some scary internal hp(not parrot) variable as it starts with a _. I may try building again tomorrow but probably will play about with the solaris failures today. > > Looks like this morning's HP-UX configure patch has worked, good. You're > still using cvs I see... > Using cvs? I am using a snv snapshot from yesterday. > Cheers, > > Nick -- It's our responsibility to competently administrate emerging products while continuing to assertively utilize multimedia based catalysts for change to exceed customer expectations
