Greetings,
Thank you for the report. Could you please give some more details about
the system you were using? OS, distribution, Perl version, gcc version,
etc.
Thank you,
smash
Hi all,
On Wed Jul 11 13:14:15 2007, bernhard wrote:
> On Di. 03. Jul. 2007, 13:19:56, smash wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I spent some time around docs/book/ch01_overview.pod. Since most of
> > this chapter is not very technical it's still pretty much up to date.
> > I added a lot of info about ro
Greetings,
On Mon Sep 13 21:31:17 2004, coke wrote:
> The compile error has changed:
>
> error:imcc:Sub isn't a PMC
> in file 'bar.imc' line 5
>
> But, IMO, this should still barf on the declaration of "index" instead.
>
> > [coke - Sun Oct 19 18:01:33 2003]:
> >
> > Is there a way to get this
Resolved in r19164, feel free to re-open if you find any problems.
Best regards,
./smash
Greetings,
On Mon Jun 18 16:57:45 2007, chromatic at wgz.org wrote:
> Per the note in src/string.c around line 509:
>
> /* XXX This is identical to string_from_cstring and should be removed */
> PARROT_API
> STRING *
> string_from_const_cstring(Interp *interp,
>
Greetings,
On Wed Mar 21 20:49:36 2007, coke wrote:
> The following patch avoids the segfault:
>
> Index: src/io/io.c
> =
> ==
> --- src/io/io.c (revision 17678)
> +++ src/io/io.c (working copy)
> @@ -1325,6 +1325,9 @@
> INTVAL
> P
Greetins,
On Sat Mar 17 15:13:56 2007, smash wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> On Thu Mar 15 06:32:28 2007, particle wrote:
> > On 3/14/07, Nuno Carvalho via RT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> > > Greetings,
> > >
> > > here are some examples running
Greetings,
On Mon Mar 19 14:32:36 2007, smash wrote:
> Greetins,
>
> On Sat Mar 17 15:13:56 2007, smash wrote:
> > Greetings,
> >
> > On Thu Mar 15 06:32:28 2007, particle wrote:
> > > On 3/14/07, Nuno Carvalho via RT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >
Greetings,
On Thu Mar 15 06:32:28 2007, particle wrote:
> On 3/14/07, Nuno Carvalho via RT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > Greetings,
> >
> > here are some examples running the changed lexer:
> >
> > $ cat 1.pir
> > .sub main :main
> > .m
nal 32-register limit.
>
> On Mar 13, 2007, at 6:45 PM, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
>
> > Am Dienstag, 13. März 2007 11:55 schrieb Nuno Carvalho via RT:
> >> so IMHO the max allowed size of the register name in the lexer
> >> should be the max allowed for an INTVAL.
>
Greetings,
On Mon Mar 12 15:25:38 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> chromatic wrote:
> > On Monday 12 March 2007 10:52, Nuno Carvalho via RT wrote:
> >
> >
> >> I've run the tests and didn't find any test failling because of
> this
> >> change.
Greetings,
On Sun Mar 11 08:03:06 2007, kjs wrote:
> Currently, S, N, I and P registers are limited to 2 digits; that is, you
> can only use:
>
> [S|N|I|P]0 to [S|N|I|P]99.
>
> For instance, this fails:
>
> .sub main
> P333 = new .Integer
> P333 = 1
> .end
>
> Since Parrot does not have a
Hi,
On Fri Mar 09 04:54:12 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> attached a patch fixing for languages/pynie:
>
> * // operator (fdiv)
> * prefix:+ operator
> * << and >> operators
>
> tests will follow later.
>
> regards,
> kjs
Looks ok to me, i'll add some tests later for this too.
Thanks, appli
Hi,
On Fri Mar 09 04:54:12 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> attached a patch fixing for languages/pynie:
>
> * // operator (fdiv)
> * prefix:+ operator
> * << and >> operators
>
> tests will follow later.
>
> regards,
> kjs
Looks ok to me, i'll add some tests later for this too.
Thanks, appli
Hi all,
On Thu Mar 08 15:23:52 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> hi,
> attached a patch for pynie:
>
> * fixed rule for floatingpoints and imag.numbers. TGE not correct yet (+
> some reorderings of rules)
> * added compound_stmt TGE
> * added tests to literals, but some are still commented out (n
Greetings,
On Mon Feb 19 18:23:59 2007, coke wrote:
> Failed Test Stat Wstat Total Fail List of Failed
>
> ---
> t/internals/select_option.t 1 256 8 14 2-8
> t/internals/select_switches.t
Greetings,
On Mon Feb 19 18:23:59 2007, coke wrote:
> Failed Test Stat Wstat Total Fail List of Failed
>
> ---
> t/internals/select_option.t 1 256 8 14 2-8
> t/internals/select_switches.t
Hiya,
On Mon Mar 05 10:32:33 2007, coke wrote:
> (all paths relative to languages/tcl)
>
> First, do a make test in tcl to get a baseline as some tests are
> failing.
languages/tcl$ make test | tee /tmp/OUTPUT
> The stub files in src/builtin/*.pir need to be relocated to
> runtime/builtin/*.pir;
Greetings,
On 2/22/07, chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wednesday 21 February 2007 21:21, Patrick R. Michaud wrote:
> 1. The t/library/pg.t tests require libpq.so to be installed
> in order to run -- should I be testing ('make fulltest') with
> this library installed?
They should skip
On Wed Nov 08 09:17:21 2006, ptc wrote:
> Implement the stub routine 'dirname' in
> languages/tcl/runtime/builtin/file.pir
>
> This ticket is in response to cage task #39704.
Implemented in revision 16967, this implementation looks more
complicated that what should be in order to cover some edge
On Tue Nov 07 15:32:38 2006, ptc wrote:
> The file languages/tcl/src/builtin/close.pir is only a stub
> implementation; it needs implementing properly.
>
> This ticket is in response to cage task #39704.
A first implementation of [close] was committed in revision 16933.
There's a little issue wi
Hi all,
This patch implements the first version of file ext for tcl. I am not
sure if it's supposed to be [file ext] or [file extension], i kept the
stub sub name 'ext' and so pushed 'ext' to the options
ResizablePMCArray. Feel free to change this.
It wasn't possible to test this using the test
Hi,
I've tried to add some tests to the rx_subrule with some extras
sensitive cases, but i'm failling two tests that i think that should
pass. I have attached a patch that adds new tests. The ones requiring
attention are the ones that fail. Not sure if i'm doing anything wrong
but my guess would b
Hi again,
Sorry, there was a problem with the last diff. Here's the most updated
patch, attached to this file, please igore the previous patch. Sorry
again.
Best regards,
./smash
On 9/15/06, Nuno Carvalho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi again,
Added some more simple tests to file &
Hi again,
Added some more simple tests to file 't/compilers/json/to_parrot.t'
related to backslashing testing. All the new tests pass. Attached to
this message you can find the patch file.
Best regards,
./smash
Index: t/compilers/json/to_parrot.t
Hi parrot people,
I haded some more tests to file 't/compilers/json/to_parrot.t' related
to numbers (test fact, exp and minus). Also haded two tests from the
RFC examples. The second one is failing due to number precision (the
test is tagged TODO). For example, we try to match:
"Longitude":-122.
Hi again,
Haded some more tests to check for white spaces problems. Some tests
fail to parse and so are marked todo. Attached to this message is the
patch for the file 't/compilers/json/to_parrot.t'.
Best regards,
./smash
On 9/7/06, Nuno Carvalho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
H
Hi all,
I haded some more tests to t/compilers/json/to_parrot.t file to test
some objects/array combinations. All tests pass at this point, except
for tests:
#17 - something about null value in a array
#25 - just added that random sequence, it does not parse not quite sure why.
Attached to this
Hi again,
I've tried this patch again and fixed only one minor detail, here's
the log of what i did:
$ rm -rf t/
$ make realclean
$ svn up
(...)
Updated to revision 14291.
$ perl Configure.pl
$ make
$ make test 2>&1 | tee BEFORE_PATCH
[apply patch]
$ svn up
At revision 14291.
$ make test 2>&1
(i initially posted this on RT, but since posts made by guests seem
not to get forwarded to the list here it is, only hope this message
goes into the right place)
Hi all,
I have applied the patch attatched to this ticket. Here's the outcome:
1) before the patch i did:
$ make test 2>&1 | tee te
Hi
Ignore & close this one i guess, everyone thought this mail was lost.
./smash
On 8/17/06, via RT Nuno Carvalho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
# New Ticket Created by Nuno Carvalho
# Please include the string: [perl #40160]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about
Good afternoon,
After some, always healthy, discussion on #parrot I've started a
very simple test file to evaluate some very simple PGE grammars. The
few grammars included in the test should work ok, except test #7 which
is supposed to fail with the current PGE. After the needed PGE
corrections
32 matches
Mail list logo
