Greetings,
On 2/22/07, chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wednesday 21 February 2007 21:21, Patrick R. Michaud wrote:
> 1. The t/library/pg.t tests require libpq.so to be installed
> in order to run -- should I be testing ('make fulltest') with
> this library installed?
They should skip without the library installed; if that doesn't work on your
platform, there's a problem with the test.
I did notice that with libpq.so, they had a problem with init_pmc, but I fixed
that and they should all work now. It would be good for someone with
PostgreSQL installed and running to run them.
Looks good to me:
* PostgreSQL installed&running:
$ prove t/library/pg.t
t/library/pg....ok
1/43 unexpectedly succeeded
All tests successful (1 subtest UNEXPECTEDLY SUCCEEDED).
Files=1, Tests=43, 1 wallclock secs ( 0.09 cusr + 0.02 csys = 0.11 CPU)
* No postgreSQL installed:
$ prove t/library/pg.t
t/library/pg....ok
43/43 skipped: skipped
All tests successful, 43 subtests skipped.
Files=1, Tests=43, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.06 cusr + 0.02 csys = 0.08 CPU)
> 2. In r17137, I'm getting one test failure from 'make fulltest':
>
> Failed Test Stat Wstat Total Fail List of Failed
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>---- t/pmc/pmethod_test.t 1 256 2 1 2
>
> Anyone know anything more about this failure, and should it just
> be marked 'TODO' or shall I see about fixing it?
Works for me on x86 Linux.
* On x86 linux:
$ prove t/pmc/pmethod_test.t
t/pmc/pmethod_test....ok
All tests successful.
Files=1, Tests=2, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.08 cusr + 0.03 csys = 0.11 CPU)
> 4. Anyone have a good name for the release? I'm satisfied with
> leaving 0.4.9 unnamed unless there's a sense that we really
> need to name it (in which case I'll come up with one or
> accept suggestions from others :-).
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_parrots
I claim Yellow Rosella for my turn.
My vote goes for 'Carolina Parakeet'.
./smash
