s under certain circumstances. Fixed in svn.
I'm going to be making a new release sometime in the next couple of
days. Might be worth hanging on to see if that fixes it?
--
Andy Armstrong, Hexten
$h = HTML::Tiny->new();
$h->body($h->head($h->title('FooPage')), $h->body(...));
I'd love to be able to drop the '$h->' everywhere. Like this:
$h->body( head( title( 'FooPage' ) ), body( ... ) );
I guess that would/could be a related mechanism.
--
Andy Armstrong, Hexten
ill probably be
released in the next few days. In the mean-time early adopters and
those afflicted by a broken 3.01 can grab 3.02 from the subversion
repo:
http://svn.hexten.net/tapx/trunk
Or can download a tarball of the latest build from
http://hexten.net/tapx/
Thanks for the report :)
--
On 31 Dec 2007, at 11:50, Andy Armstrong wrote:
Sure thing. What's the approved method of running a single test?
Ignore this.
--
Andy Armstrong, Hexten
thod of running a single test?
--
Andy Armstrong, Hexten
On 31 Dec 2007, at 05:04, chromatic wrote:
Full test log available on request.
I'd like to see verbose output for just the shootout tests. I've
fixed those
a few times before.
$ perl t/harness -v t/examples/shootout.t 2&>1 > shootout.txt
http://hexten.net/junk/s
esult: FAIL
$ uname -a
Linux shonky 2.6.20-16-powerpc #3 Sun Sep 23 19:20:00 UTC 2007 ppc GNU/
Linux
Full test log available on request.
--
Andy Armstrong, Hexten
Sorry if I've missed something recent that means that this is expected
behaviour but r24318 is hanging during make test on Mac OS 10.5.1 /
Intel.
The test log and pictures of the process probe are here:
http://hexten.net/junk/20071230-193600/
--
Andy Armstrong, Hexten
On 12 Dec 2007, at 19:53, Allison Randal wrote:
So, I'm interested to see what your 10.5 box does.
I uncommented the Parrot_cx calls and ran the tests twice - once with
CX_DEBUG = 1, once with CX_DEBUG = 0. It got through them all both
times :)
--
Andy Armstrong, Hexten
On 11 Dec 2007, at 22:39, Tim Bunce wrote:
Perhaps new contributors could make notes about stumblings blocks
encountered along the way, so we know where to put signposts for
others
who follow.
Good plan. I'll keep notes.
--
Andy Armstrong, Hexten
headspace I'll just pick a ticket and run with
it, thanks.
--
Andy Armstrong, Hexten
On 11 Dec 2007, at 17:28, Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
"Andy" == Andy Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andy> Or perhaps somebody could podcast an interview with them? :)
Perhaps you were joking, but I noted that as a potential show for
FLOSS
Weekly. Thanks for the
On 11 Dec 2007, at 04:57, Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
"Andy" == Andy Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andy> Rubinus (new Ruby runtime)
Andy> http://www.infoq.com/news/2007/12/engine-yard-bets-big-rubinius
I'm trying to figure out why Rubinous is building a
Rubinus (new Ruby runtime)
http://www.infoq.com/news/2007/12/engine-yard-bets-big-rubinius
C--: a portable assembly language that supports garbage collection
http://research.microsoft.com/~simonpj/Papers/c--/c--gc.htm
Everybody's at it :)
--
Andy Armstrong, Hexten
3.00 - so to some extent I've answered my own question -
but I'd like to get my hands dirty with Parrot proper too.
--
Andy Armstrong, Hexten
On 9 Dec 2007, at 21:02, Allison Randal wrote:
Andy Armstrong wrote:
And Instruments is telling me this:
http://hexten.net/junk/parrot1.png
Nice level of detail in this tool. Almost worth the cost of 10.5 all
on its own.
It seems rather lovely. Bear in mind that I didn't even laun
y with CX_DEBUG enabled - including
once during make rather than make test.
What next?
--
Andy Armstrong, Hexten
On 8 Dec 2007, at 14:18, Andy Armstrong wrote:
Please let me know if there's anything you'd like me to investigate.
I'm afraid I don't know my way around parrot, er, at all - but I'm
willing to learn.
Ah, Mac OS 10.5 has dtrace - which I hadn't tried befor
willing to learn.
In happier news it's snowing here and repeatedly running the parrot
test suite is warming my knees up nicely :)
--
Andy Armstrong, Hexten
.287/335
for about ten minutes until I interrupted it and then
t/op/string_cs.1/50
for another ten or so minutes.
--
Andy Armstrong, Hexten
On 7 Dec 2007, at 23:19, Chas. Owens wrote:
That is my take on it: "Everything is bigger in Texas", even French
Quotes.
You know, from a complete outsider's perspective, I really prefer the
Paris, Texas explanation :)
--
Andy Armstrong, Hexten
On 4 Dec 2007, at 16:19, Andy Armstrong wrote:
my $amp = '&'; # No unit, plain text
my $body = "$amp"html; # gets &
Per http://search.cpan.org/~andya/String-Smart/ I should say.
--
Andy Armstrong, Hexten
olating plain text into a string that has the
unit 'html' would force a (user defined) html upgrade on the
interpolated text.
On the other hand
my $amp = '&'html;
my $body = "$amp"html; # gets &
--
Andy Armstrong, Hexten
On 28 Nov 2007, at 18:28, James Fuller wrote:
A few things I could imagine; native XML data type (and whatever that
means at this late stage)
What might that mean at any stage?
--
Andy Armstrong, Hexten
px/trunk
Or can download a tarball of the latest build from
http://hexten.net/tapx/
Thanks for the report :)
--
Andy Armstrong, Hexten
about two months ago (and I
reported it at the time) and it went away when I uninstalled T::H
2.99_02.
That's a pretty compelling smoking gun :)
I'm checking out parrot now...
--
Andy Armstrong, Hexten
x/trunk/blib/lib -I/Users/
andy/Works/Perl/TAPx-Parser/tapx/trunk/blib/arch parrot.t
ok
All tests successful.
Files=1, Tests=1, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.01 usr + 0.00 sys = 0.01 CPU)
Result: PASS
The only difference seems to be that T::H 3.01 makes the paths absolute.
If I get time tomorrow I'll install parrot on this machine and try it
for real.
--
Andy Armstrong, Hexten
On 7 Aug 2007, at 15:51, Andy Lester wrote:
Does MS provide any cheapie installs of their compiler? I now have
WinXP running on my Mac laptop and it would be swell if I could do
builds on MSVC, too.
This any use?
http://msdn.microsoft.com/vstudio/express/
--
Andy Armstrong, hexten.net
* copy int at q into int at p */
*p = *q; /* the same */
p = q; /* p and q point to same memory */
You're thinking of the third case - Andy is doing the second.
--
Andy Armstrong, hexten.net
r than adding some other potentially useful
functionality?
You're going to surprise people who use x to create padding strings
if a negative count produces a padding string of the same length.
--
Andy Armstrong, hexten.net
a as it is for C :)
(which is to say, Java is also guaranteed to short circuit properly
as are most other mainstream languages these days)
--
Andy Armstrong, hexten.net
On 16 May 2007, at 15:20, Andy Armstrong wrote:
More pedantically bitwise & and | are guaranteed to evaluate both
arguments.
And as you say they don't constitute a sequence point[1] so the order
of evaluation of the arguments is undefined.
[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seque
hort circuit completely reliably.
--
Andy Armstrong, hexten.net
On 14 May 2007, at 12:31, Thomas Wittek wrote:
How did C, C#, Java, Ruby, Python, Lua, JavaScript, Visual Basic,
etc. know?
They didn't.
If there is a new release, you always have to check if your code
still runs.
I think that may be the point I'm making.
--
Andy Armstrong, hexten.net
in the future so you could avoid them all?
--
Andy Armstrong, hexten.net
is all :)
--
Andy Armstrong, hexten.net
at or a close variation of it was a pretty common idiom.
--
Andy Armstrong, hexten.net
The security angle is that it prevents the creation of subclasses
that can circumvent security restrictions in the base class.
I wonder if some of the debate here was informed by the perception
that 'final' is a valuable feature in Java whereas actually it's a
hacky bodge to solve a couple of language design problems?
--
Andy Armstrong, hexten.net
On 20 Sep 2006, at 19:05, Larry Wall wrote:
Let it be. :)
I could just as easily have called for a revolution :)
--
Andy Armstrong, hexten.net
onnotation - but 'grep' has the benefit that it also has an existing
perl connotation.
--
Andy Armstrong, hexten.net
n the same as) PIC?
It's not quite the same is it? The method Avi and Piers describe
involves a normal call to a method the first action of which is to
find out whether it's really the correct method.
--
Andy Armstrong, hexten.net
41 matches
Mail list logo
