On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 03:29:35PM +0200, Gerhard R. wrote:
> Appreciated.
>
> > The only really invasive non-obvious one is patch 4. Solaris cc doesn't
> > support anonymous unions, but MVMOSHandleBody uses them extensively.
> > I had to give the anonymous union a name everywhere in order to get
Appreciated.
> The only really invasive non-obvious one is patch 4. Solaris cc doesn't
> support anonymous unions, but MVMOSHandleBody uses them extensively.
> I had to give the anonymous union a name everywhere in order to get it
> to compile.
Is this actually necessary if you pass -features=ex
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 08:46:53AM -0400, Andy Dougherty wrote:
> I have attached a new batch of patches to work towards building MoarVM on
> Solaris 11/x86 with Sun's compiler suite. One additional patch is needed
> to the 3rdparty/dyncall module, but since that's in a git submodule,
> I'll send
I have attached a new batch of patches to work towards building MoarVM on
Solaris 11/x86 with Sun's compiler suite. One additional patch is needed
to the 3rdparty/dyncall module, but since that's in a git submodule,
I'll send it separately.
The patches were made with git format-patch and are atta
