On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 03:29:35PM +0200, Gerhard R. wrote:
> Appreciated.
>
> > The only really invasive non-obvious one is patch 4. Solaris cc doesn't
> > support anonymous unions, but MVMOSHandleBody uses them extensively.
> > I had to give the anonymous union a name everywhere in order to get it
> > to compile.
>
> Is this actually necessary if you pass -features=extensions ? The
> manual is a bit unclear on that...
Yes, unfortunately, this is still necessary. According to my copy of
the Fine Manual, -features=extensions
Allows zero-sized struct/union declarations and void
function with return statements returning a value to
work.
which is different from anonymous (but not zero-sized) unions. Just to
be sure, I tried anyway, and it didn't handle the anonymous unions.
--
Andy Dougherty dough...@lafayette.edu
