Branch: refs/heads/master
Home: https://github.com/perl6/specs
Commit: 6967af185e89ef33cfe2d56afea2f3ea9a76139d
https://github.com/perl6/specs/commit/6967af185e89ef33cfe2d56afea2f3ea9a76139d
Author: Larry Wall
Date: 2012-01-27 (Fri, 27 Jan 2012)
Changed paths:
M S29-fun
Branch: refs/heads/master
Home: https://github.com/perl6/specs
Commit: 0de30ceb65e5a49edfcc84e495521cf631bbd277
https://github.com/perl6/specs/commit/0de30ceb65e5a49edfcc84e495521cf631bbd277
Author: Larry Wall
Date: 2012-01-27 (Fri, 27 Jan 2012)
Changed paths:
M S32-set
Yeah, sorry about that:
[<<,>>] ([], []) #FAILS
([] <<,>> []) #Works fine.
»ö«
P.S. i turned the '<>' into the non-unicode digraph in case you couldn't see
them (In your reply they came back as �, a black diamond with a question mark).
On Jan 27, 2012, at 4:10 AM, Carl Mäsak via RT wrote:
# New Ticket Created by Paweł Pabian
# Please include the string: [perl #109218]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org:443/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=109218 >
Problem:
[18:22] rakudo: class A { has $.x = 1; has $.y = $.x; }; class B is A
On Fri Jan 27 02:21:32 2012, pawel.pab...@implix.com wrote:
> $ perl6 -e 'sub foo ( :$id? where { say "I should not be here when
> there is no
> param passed"} ) {}; foo()'
>
> Returns:
> I should not be here when there is no param passed
>
> $ perl6 --version
> This is perl6 version 2012.01 buil
# New Ticket Created by Paweł Pabian
# Please include the string: [perl #109188]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org:443/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=109188 >
Steps to reproduce bug:
[13:16] rakudo: Array|Hash
[13:16] rakudo 052cc6: OUTP
# New Ticket Created by Paweł Pabian
# Please include the string: [perl #109182]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org:443/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=109182 >
$ perl6 -e 'sub foo ( :$id? where { say "I should not be here when there is no
p
On Thu Jan 26 13:07:44 2012, ta...@necsi.edu wrote:
> When I try to run anything with [�op�] it breaks. This is as an
> alternative to writing @a[0] �op� @a[1].
>
> The error is: "Nominal type check failed for parameter '$op'; expected
> Any but got Mu instead"
>
> Cheers,
> ���
>
Thank y