Yeah, sorry about that: [<<,>>] ([<a b c>], [<d e f g>]) #FAILS
([<a b c>] <<,>> [<d e f g>]) #Works fine. »ö« P.S. i turned the '<</>>' into the non-unicode digraph in case you couldn't see them (In your reply they came back as �, a black diamond with a question mark). On Jan 27, 2012, at 4:10 AM, Carl Mäsak via RT wrote: > On Thu Jan 26 13:07:44 2012, [email protected] wrote: >> When I try to run anything with [�op�] it breaks. This is as an >> alternative to writing @a[0] �op� @a[1]. >> >> The error is: "Nominal type check failed for parameter '$op'; expected >> Any but got Mu instead" >> >> Cheers, >> ��� >> > > Thank you for your report. Please supply not just the error message, but > the code that fails for you. It's extremely useful to have some code to > be able to reproduce the problem with on the fixing side. >
