[perl #66886] tests available

2009-08-09 Thread kyleha
This is an automatically generated mail to inform you that tests are now available in t/spec/S12-enums/thorough.t commit 60bdcc42fd6b09bcd4d19278cb2f8be3a79d430f Author: kyle Date: Mon Aug 10 05:02:58 2009 + [t/spec] Test for RT #66886 git-svn-id: http://svn.pugscode.org/p...

[perl #67450] [BUG] .[+*] seems to be incorrect

2009-08-09 Thread Patrick R. Michaud via RT
On Sat Jul 11 06:57:11 2009, richardh wrote: > perl6 > > my @x=1,2,3,4; my @z; for @x { @z[+*] = $_ }; @z.perl.say > [4] > > my @x=1,2,3,4; my @z; for @x { @z...@z] = $_ }; @z.perl.say > [1,2,3,4] Now fixed in f48920, thanks! $ ./perl6 > my @x = 1,2,3,4; my @z; for @x { @z[+*] = $_ }; @z.

[perl #68004] +* does not generate Code

2009-08-09 Thread Patrick R. Michaud via RT
On Wed Jul 29 05:30:51 2009, colo...@gmail.com wrote: > According to http://perlcabal.org/syn/S03.html#Nesting_of_metaoperators > +* should generate a closure which numifies. This does not work, as > > my $x = +*; > isa_ok $x, Code, '+* is of type Code'; > > fails, as do attempts to use

Re: Rukudo-Star => Rakudo-lite?

2009-08-09 Thread Patrick R. Michaud
On Sun, Aug 09, 2009 at 04:35:42PM -0600, David Green wrote: > On 2009-Aug-9, at 3:57 pm, Tim Bunce wrote: >> Perhaps it's worth asking what we might call the release after that >> one. >> "Rakudo not-quite-so-lite"? > > Rakudo ** (aka "Rakudo Exponentiation")? Though I think Patrick is > opti

Re: Rukudo-Star => Rakudo-lite?

2009-08-09 Thread David Green
On 2009-Aug-9, at 6:30 am, Richard Hainsworth wrote: Its just that */star/whatever doesnt convey [to me] the fact that its a sub-set of of Perl6. I like "*"... it has more personality than "lite". (Or even "light".) Though since it's a subset, we could always call it "Rakudo ⊂"! On 2009-

Re: Rukudo-Star => Rakudo-lite?

2009-08-09 Thread Patrick R. Michaud
On Sun, Aug 09, 2009 at 10:57:16PM +0100, Tim Bunce wrote: > > > Since Rakudo* (not sure how it is to be written) is intended to be a > > > cut-down version of perl6.0.0 that is useable, how about Rakudo-lite? > > > > Hmmm, that's a very reasonable name. Over the past few days I've > > become a

Re: Rukudo-Star => Rakudo-lite?

2009-08-09 Thread Tim Bunce
On Sun, Aug 09, 2009 at 10:19:44AM -0500, Patrick R. Michaud wrote: > On Sun, Aug 09, 2009 at 04:30:07PM +0400, Richard Hainsworth wrote: > > Referring to Patrick's blog about an official 'useable' version of > > Rakudo, a suggestion: > > > > Since Rakudo* (not sure how it is to be written) is in

Re: Rukudo-Star => Rakudo-lite?

2009-08-09 Thread Henry Baragar
Ruby anyone? See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rake_(software). Henry On August 9, 2009 11:44:24 am Austin Hastings wrote: > How about "Rake"? > > =Austin > > Richard Hainsworth wrote: > > Referring to Patrick's blog about an official 'useable' version of > > Rakudo, a suggestion: > > > > Since R

[perl #67976] tests available

2009-08-09 Thread kyleha
This is an automatically generated mail to inform you that tests are now available in at least one of these files: t/spec/S11-modules/nested.t, t/spec/packages/RoleA.pm, t/spec/packages/RoleB.pm commit 6a963e08bbbf22ea362a4b11fb1dc9be50a286b0 Author: moritz Date: Sun Aug 9 16:40:38 2009 +

Re: Rukudo-Star => Rakudo-lite?

2009-08-09 Thread Austin Hastings
How about "Rake"? =Austin Richard Hainsworth wrote: Referring to Patrick's blog about an official 'useable' version of Rakudo, a suggestion: Since Rakudo* (not sure how it is to be written) is intended to be a cut-down version of perl6.0.0 that is useable, how about Rakudo-lite? Its just

Re: Rukudo-Star => Rakudo-lite?

2009-08-09 Thread Kyle Hasselbacher
Rakudo Light Rakudo Star Light Rakudo Rock Star Rakudo Hard Rock Rakudo Play Hard Rakudo Play Just musing...

Re: Rukudo-Star => Rakudo-lite?

2009-08-09 Thread Patrick R. Michaud
On Sun, Aug 09, 2009 at 04:30:07PM +0400, Richard Hainsworth wrote: > Referring to Patrick's blog about an official 'useable' version of > Rakudo, a suggestion: > > Since Rakudo* (not sure how it is to be written) is intended to be a > cut-down version of perl6.0.0 that is useable, how about Ra

Re: problem with Rakudo on GitHub?

2009-08-09 Thread Sol Foster
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Carl_M=E4sak?= wrote: > > Offer Kaye (>): > >> git clone http://github.com/rakudo/rakudo.git > > > > walk 23e8f09a4dcb8adcb13df8c53878f8e2279b4d4e > > got 6cc47d6a45ca2981f1500c07879dbd639a502df6 > > got f7255c6991886e6b0683611dbf4fce92c624b036 > > got 307da96f9ed2a2d9db4a406a1b623

Re: problem with Rakudo on GitHub?

2009-08-09 Thread Carl Mäsak
Offer Kaye (>): >> git clone http://github.com/rakudo/rakudo.git > > walk 23e8f09a4dcb8adcb13df8c53878f8e2279b4d4e > got 6cc47d6a45ca2981f1500c07879dbd639a502df6 > got f7255c6991886e6b0683611dbf4fce92c624b036 > got 307da96f9ed2a2d9db4a406a1b6231c3ffb7d560 > error: inflate: data stream error (incorr

Re: problem with Rakudo on GitHub?

2009-08-09 Thread Kyle Hasselbacher
It works for me. If I use the command you pasted, it's very chatty, but it completes successfully. git clone git://github.com/rakudo/rakudo.git Using that command, it's not so verbose, and it also completes successfully. Kyle. On Sun, Aug 9, 2009 at 8:01 AM, Offer Kaye wrote: >> git clone http

problem with Rakudo on GitHub?

2009-08-09 Thread Offer Kaye
> git clone http://github.com/rakudo/rakudo.git walk 23e8f09a4dcb8adcb13df8c53878f8e2279b4d4e got 6cc47d6a45ca2981f1500c07879dbd639a502df6 got f7255c6991886e6b0683611dbf4fce92c624b036 got 307da96f9ed2a2d9db4a406a1b6231c3ffb7d560 error: inflate: data stream error (incorrect header check) error: inf

Rukudo-Star => Rakudo-lite?

2009-08-09 Thread Richard Hainsworth
Referring to Patrick's blog about an official 'useable' version of Rakudo, a suggestion: Since Rakudo* (not sure how it is to be written) is intended to be a cut-down version of perl6.0.0 that is useable, how about Rakudo-lite? Its just that */star/whatever doesnt convey [to me] the fact that

Re: [perl #68274] Script runs for ~18,000 iterations then seg faults

2009-08-09 Thread Gilbert R. Röhrbein
Solomon Foster (via RT) wrote: use v6; loop (my $n = 2; $n <= 354294; $n++) { my @digits = $n.comb(/\d/); my $sum = [+] (@digits >>**>> 5); say "$n, $sum" if ($n % 1234 == 0); say "$n = sum of its digits to the 5th power!!!" if ($sum == $n); } This simple Project Euler script di