On Sun, Aug 09, 2009 at 10:57:16PM +0100, Tim Bunce wrote: > > > Since Rakudo* (not sure how it is to be written) is intended to be a > > > cut-down version of perl6.0.0 that is useable, how about Rakudo-lite? > > > > Hmmm, that's a very reasonable name. Over the past few days I've > > become a little attached to "Rakudo Star", but I agree that > > "Rakudo light" might be a bit more descriptive. I'll have to > > mull it over a while. > [...] > I like "Rakudo Star". It doesn't try to be descriptive. It's just a name.
Based on #perl6 discussions and a few other threads, I've decided we'll stick with "Rakudo Star". It's non-descriptiveness is an asset at this point. Pm
