Re: [perl #44457] [TODO] make sure files match test files for DYNPMCs and DYNOPs etc

--- El vie 12-sep-08, Rafael Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió: De:: Rafael Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Asunto: Re: [perl #44457] [TODO] make sure files match test files for DYNPMCs and DYNOPs etc A: "Christoph Otto" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fecha: viernes, 12 septiembre, 200

Re: [perl #59398] [PATCH] Moving methods from Str.pir toany-str.pir

On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 01:53:44AM +1000, Vasily Chekalkin wrote: > Patrick R. Michaud wrote: >> This section of code would be much simpler (and more efficient) >> by using the C and C instead of >> individually examining each character one-at-a-time. >> >>> +.sub 'chop' :method >>> +len = leng

Re: [perl #59410] [PATCH] CONTROL_LOOP_NEXT support for pct. Rakudo won't build, though.

> Cardinal's works fine, but with this patch, rakudo hangs while building. > Specifically, on parrot -o perl6.pbc perl6.pir. Oddly, if I comment out the builtins (line 25): .include 'src/gen_builtins.pir' then perl6.pbc compiles just fine. It doesn't run, of course, because the builtins are

Re: [perl #59398] [PATCH] Moving methods from Str.pir toany-str.pir

Patrick R. Michaud wrote: ... This section of code would be much simpler (and more efficient) by using the C and C instead of individually examining each character one-at-a-time. +.sub 'chop' :method +len = length tmps +if len == 0 goto done +dec len +substr tmps,tmps, 0, len

Re: Problem building parrot

On Sunday 28 September 2008 05:47:14 Nikolay Ananiev wrote: > I'm trying to build parrot r31477 with visual studio 2008 on vista home and > i get the following error > > src\pmc\exceptionhandler.c > .\src\pmc\exceptionhandler.pmc(34) : error C2275: > 'Parrot_ExceptionHandler_attri > butes' : illeg

Re: Split with negative limits, and other weirdnesses

On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 11:40 AM, Chris Davaz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ok, so 0 returns the empty list and -1 violates the signature? In PIR > can we have such signatures that put a constraint on the range of > values for a given parameter? Maybe this has already been proposed and rejected, bu

Re: Split with negative limits, and other weirdnesses

Ok, so 0 returns the empty list and -1 violates the signature? In PIR can we have such signatures that put a constraint on the range of values for a given parameter? On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 7:25 PM, Carl Mäsak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Jason (>): >> It makes sense to me to go with option 1; you

Re: [perl #59394] [PATCH] Implementation of Pair.pairs.

On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 04:00:47AM +1000, Vasily Chekalkin wrote: > Patrick R. Michaud via RT wrote: >>> +$P0 = get_hll_namespace ['Perl6Pair'] >>> +'!EXPORT'('pairs', $P0) >> >> It's probably wrong to export 'pairs' here -- the exported pairs >> function should be the one that is on 'Any'.

Re: [perl #59398] [PATCH] Moving methods from Str.pir to any-str.pir

On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 05:44:43AM -0700, Vasily Chekalkin wrote: > --- a/languages/perl6/src/builtins/any-str.pir > +++ b/languages/perl6/src/builtins/any-str.pir > + > +=item capitalize > + [...] > +=cut > + > +.local int pos, is_ws, is_lc > +pos = 0 > +goto first_char > + next_graph

Problem building parrot

I'm trying to build parrot r31477 with visual studio 2008 on vista home and i get the following error src\pmc\exceptionhandler.c .\src\pmc\exceptionhandler.pmc(34) : error C2275: 'Parrot_ExceptionHandler_attri butes' : illegal use of this type as an expression d:\dev\projects_out\parrot

Re: Split with negative limits, and other weirdnesses

Jason (>): > It makes sense to me to go with option 1; you get what you ask for. It also > makes sense to make to not use magical implied numbers, such as negatives, > to accomplish things that either ranges or whatever star can accomplish. Aye, agreement. There's a whole lot of consensus already.