Ok, so 0 returns the empty list and -1 violates the signature? In PIR can we have such signatures that put a constraint on the range of values for a given parameter?
On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 7:25 PM, Carl Mäsak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Jason (>): >> It makes sense to me to go with option 1; you get what you ask for. It also >> makes sense to make to not use magical implied numbers, such as negatives, >> to accomplish things that either ranges or whatever star can accomplish. > > Aye, agreement. There's a whole lot of consensus already... reading > through the discussion once more, I don't find anyone saying anything > contradicting the above summary. > > Chris, I'm not in a position to provide a final word, but it seems > very possible already to use what has already been said here as a > basis for an implementation. > > // Carl >
