jerry gay wrote:
On Jan 9, 2008 12:08 AM, Cosimo wrote:
So question is: would be useful to "port" the substr()
test script from Perl5's `t/op/substr.t' also to Perl6?
what we ultimately want is tests that cover the spec, which for
'substr' is probably very close to the perl 5 spec. however, m
On Tue Jun 28 07:32:02 2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> The following PIR (attached as "script.pir", and also included here)
> fails under Parrot 0.2.1 (Fedora Core 3, Intel x86):
>
> .sub main @MAIN
>$P1 = newclass "PARENT_1"
>addattribute $P1, "foo"#1
>$P2 = subclass
James Keenan via RT wrote:
> The build tools tests are intended to be run after someone has made
> changes in modules such as lib/Parrot/Pmc2cUtils/, Ops2cUtils and
> Ops2pmutils/. They're set up to be run after Configure.pl has completed
> but before make has been invoked. (In fact, they will ge
On Wed Jan 09 06:59:41 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Fixed in r24703
Unfortunately, it breaks one of the tests we've put in place for testing
the build tools (the various .pl files invoked by 'make'). See attached.
The build tools tests are intended to be run after someone has made
changes in
# from Rafael Garcia-Suarez
# on Wednesday 09 January 2008 05:36:
>Allison Randal wrote in perl.perl6.internals :
>> In the Python test suite, there's a single global location to
>> declare a list of test files that are expected to be skipped on a
>> particular platform. This has a much cleaner fe
On Sunday 06 January 2008 11:15:25 Andy Lester wrote:
> With the new contributor day coming up, I'd like to run an article on
> Perlbuzz about it. Can anyone supply me some text? Or point me to a
> preferred old text that I can adapt? I'm looking at
> http://www.oreillynet.com/onlamp/blog/2007/
218
-sol8-sparc-gcc_4.1.0 B--- - - -Y/36*4 ?
20071218
+sol8-sparc-gcc_4.1.0 B--- - - -Y/171 ?
20080109
sol10-sparc-cc_5.8 BY-- Y Y YY/9 ?
20060807
sol10-sparc-gcc_4.0.2BY--
On Jan 9, 2008 12:08 AM, Cosimo Streppone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm trying to play with perl6.exe.
> I've wandered in the opened tickets for perl6 and
> saw this one about `substr()':
>
> http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=44321
>
> It ends with a patch that enables the 3rd op
Unfortunately I haven't been able to test the patch, however, icc
*should* handle -W flags exactly the same as gcc. And if it doesn't,
then there is an issue there we (or Intel) should deal with. So, I
would update the patch to ask if we have gcc or icc. I agree that -W
doesn't apply to some ot
Allison Randal wrote in perl.perl6.internals :
> In the Python test suite, there's a single global location to declare a
> list of test files that are expected to be skipped on a particular
> platform. This has a much cleaner feel than our own motley collection of
> skip and todo markers in vari
# New Ticket Created by Andy Dougherty
# Please include the string: [perl #49558]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=49558 >
This patch just notes a problem area. In order to pick the correct linker
on platform
On 09/01/2008, chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Monday 07 January 2008 20:09:26 Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote:
>
> > --- config/auto/warnings.pm.dist 2008-01-08 05:51:42.0 +0200
> > +++ config/auto/warnings.pm 2008-01-08 06:01:23.0 +0200
> > @@ -132,17 +132,22 @@
> >
On Wed, 9 Jan 2008, Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote:
> --- config/init/hints/dec_osf.pm.dist 2008-01-09 04:57:50.0 +0200
> +++ config/init/hints/dec_osf.pm 2008-01-09 05:23:23.0 +0200
> @@ -43,8 +45,9 @@
> $conf->data->set( linkflags => $linkflags );
> }
>
> -# Re
Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote:
--- config/init/hints/dec_osf.pm.dist 2008-01-09 04:57:50.0 +0200
+++ config/init/hints/dec_osf.pm2008-01-09 05:23:23.0 +0200
@@ -14,8 +14,10 @@
Jarkko: Our RT system doesn't pick up new submissions that go (only) to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Coul
In the Python test suite, there's a single global location to declare a
list of test files that are expected to be skipped on a particular
platform. This has a much cleaner feel than our own motley collection of
skip and todo markers in various test files.
Something to consider after the 1.0 r
Sorry, essentially what I'm asking is if i can pass a pir method as a
function pointer on a c call.
essentially what I'm looking to do is get into the message pump on
windows, and I'm trying to keep all of the code within pir.
I'm trying to see how many hoops I need to do in order to write a
--- config/init/hints/dec_osf.pm.dist 2008-01-09 04:57:50.0 +0200
+++ config/init/hints/dec_osf.pm2008-01-09 05:23:23.0 +0200
@@ -14,8 +14,10 @@
if ( $ccflags !~ /-pthread/ ) {
$ccflags .= ' -pthread';
}
+if ( $ccflags !~ /-D_REENTRANT/ ) {
+
I'm trying to play with perl6.exe.
I've wandered in the opened tickets for perl6 and
saw this one about `substr()':
http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=44321
It ends with a patch that enables the 3rd optional
argument for substr(). I gave it a shot, and it seems to
work.
So questi
18 matches
Mail list logo
