# New Ticket Created by Patrick R. Michaud
# Please include the string: [perl #47996]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=47996 >
PGE seems to have trouble with
[ :sigspace(0) this is not spaced ] # fails
# New Ticket Created by Patrick R. Michaud
# Please include the string: [perl #47992]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=47992 >
I just recently committed examples/sdl/blue_rect.pl as an
example of exercising th
Marking ticket as resolved, thanks!
Pm
On Nov 29, 2007 6:18 PM, Patrick R. Michaud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 11:22:30AM -0800, James Fuller wrote:
> > # New Ticket Created by "James Fuller"
> > # Please include the string: [perl #47926]
> > # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issu
On Friday 30 November 2007 07:45:42 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> +If you embedded a Parrot in your C file and you want to invoke another
> function
> +in that same C file, you should pass a null string to loadlib. Do
This only works if the dlopen()-like implementation on the platform follows
POSI
chromatic wrote:
On Thursday 29 November 2007 20:54:13 Will Coleda wrote:
$ svn diff
Index: src/parser/indent.pir
===
--- src/parser/indent.pir (revision 23256)
+++ src/parser/indent.pir (working copy)
@@ -17,7 +17,7 @@
Robert Lemmen schrieb:
hi folks,
i want to write a compiler for a small prototype-based language that
should target parrot. as a reminder: prototype-based means that i have
objects, and objects are cloned from other objects, but i have no
classes. objects consist of methods and variables that ar
Patrick R. Michaud wrote:
The problem isn't so much with ParrotIO as it is with the way that
'say' is implemented. Say expects to be able to get the ParrotIO
class object and invoke the 'say' method on it -- but this is no
longer valid under pdd15 objects, where the class methods are no
longe
hi folks,
i want to write a compiler for a small prototype-based language that
should target parrot. as a reminder: prototype-based means that i have
objects, and objects are cloned from other objects, but i have no
classes. objects consist of methods and variables that are only
accessible to meth
Hi Jerry,
> Besides the obvious _Perl6 and Parrot Essentials_, are there any
> other books that one could use to get a good background for Parrot
> development? I'm wondering if there are any references that people
> developing Parrot are using.
AFAIK Perl6 and Parrot Essentials isn't very up to
On Nov 30 2007, ptc wrote:
> > https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=46539
> > [BUG] compilers/pirc/new/pir.l failing t/codingstd/cppcomments.t
> > Coke commented on this on Oct 21, but ticket has not been resolved.
> > Spot check of smoke tests suggests it may now be passing on all OSes.
By the time this got written, I see James has bowed out of the
discussion with some words about 'architectural break points'. Even so,
my two-penniworth:
JF gave some examples of how he would like xml to be 'a part of core'.
For clarity, I use xml and I have designed a language to describe
fi
On Nov 30, 2007 10:57 AM, David Green <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Maybe some kind of "Advisory Board" would help, where people (who
> might be experts in various ways) can offer informed recommendations
> on what modules make a good fit for what circumstances. Ultimately,
> if this is something w
Besides the obvious _Perl6 and Parrot Essentials_, are there any
other books that one could use to get a good background for Parrot
development? I'm wondering if there are any references that people
developing Parrot are using.
Thanks,
Jerry
On 11/29/07, James Fuller wrote:
well, if my previous posts didn't attract flames this post
certainly will ;)
Nah, this is getting into the interesting language part!
(Technically, it should be perl6+xml-language... but then the goal of
perl6 is to be infinitely flexible, so I guess it is
On 11/29/07, James Fuller wrote:
but by making some fundamental xml processing available by the core
(like file access, regex, and a host of other fundamental bits n
bobs), u do promote a common and systematic approach to working with
XML in all perl modules.
As everyone else and his dog has
> https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=46539
> [BUG] compilers/pirc/new/pir.l failing t/codingstd/cppcomments.t
> Coke commented on this on Oct 21, but ticket has not been resolved.
> Spot check of smoke tests suggests it may now be passing on all OSes.
compilers/pirc/new/pir.l is exempt
17 matches
Mail list logo
