On Wed Nov 07 15:35:16 2007, ptc wrote:
> This is a very similar patch to that which I just posted (RT#47245) in
> that it moves executable code out of a header. This time
> include/atomic/gcc_pcc.h is the header. Unfortunately, since I don't
> have access to a ppc machine I can't test this patch
On 08/11/2007, chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wednesday 07 November 2007 14:58:40 Paul Cochrane wrote:
>
> > The file include/atomic/gcc_x86.h contains executable code. The
> > attached patch moves this code out into a new file
> > src/atomic/gcc_x86.c. make test passes, so things look
# New Ticket Created by Paul Cochrane
# Please include the string: [perl #47247]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=47247 >
This is a very similar patch to that which I just posted (RT#47245) in
that it moves ex
On Wednesday 07 November 2007 14:58:40 Paul Cochrane wrote:
> The file include/atomic/gcc_x86.h contains executable code. The
> attached patch moves this code out into a new file
> src/atomic/gcc_x86.c. make test passes, so things look ok to make
> this move from this standpoint, however I'd lik
# New Ticket Created by Paul Cochrane
# Please include the string: [perl #47245]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=47245 >
The file include/atomic/gcc_x86.h contains executable code. The
attached patch moves t
