[perl #45601] [unified_testing] Plans and notes for the unified testing branch

2007-09-21 Thread James Keenan via RT
On Thu Sep 20 13:03:31 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > http://perlsix.org/svn/parrot/view/branches/unified_testing/BRANCH_TODO > > > Goals: > > Completely unified testing. [snip] > 5) Add processing of the output of Configure --test. > When I began working on writing tests for the Perl 5 co

Re: [svn:parrot] r21429 - in trunk: include/parrot src/gc

2007-09-21 Thread jerry gay
On 9/21/07, chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thursday 20 September 2007 09:38:28 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Modified: > >trunk/include/parrot/register.h > >trunk/src/gc/register.c > > > > Log: > > [gc]: add 'struct' to Parrot_Context in func decls/defs > > I'm not much of a fan

[svn:parrot-pdd] r21465 - in trunk: docs/pdds lib/Parrot/Pmc2c

2007-09-21 Thread particle
Author: particle Date: Fri Sep 21 10:14:20 2007 New Revision: 21465 Modified: trunk/docs/pdds/pdd17_pmc.pod Changes in other areas also in this revision: Modified: trunk/lib/Parrot/Pmc2c/Parser.pm Log: [PDD17]: use VTABLE marker when defining vtable functions ~ modified PDD17 text to speci

[svn:perl6-synopsis] r14464 - doc/trunk/design/syn

2007-09-21 Thread larry
Author: larry Date: Fri Sep 21 10:00:16 2007 New Revision: 14464 Modified: doc/trunk/design/syn/S02.pod doc/trunk/design/syn/S13.pod Log: Make easier way to specify outgoing coercions. Typo from Thom++ Modified: doc/trunk/design/syn/S02.pod

Re: [ANN] Lua on Parrot 0.4.16

2007-09-21 Thread Mike Pall
Hi, François Perrad wrote: > I'm interested by the source of yours benchmarks, for me, it's > more test case. These are the Lua benchmarks I've written for the shootout. You're already using these in your testcases. :-) SciMark for Lua is at: http://luajit.org/download/scimark-2007-09-19.lua

[svn:parrot-pdd] r21461 - in trunk: . docs/pdds src/ops

2007-09-21 Thread bernhard
Author: bernhard Date: Fri Sep 21 09:25:05 2007 New Revision: 21461 Modified: trunk/docs/pdds/pdd17_pmc.pod Changes in other areas also in this revision: Modified: trunk/PBC_COMPAT trunk/src/ops/pmc.ops Log: #42352: [TODO] remove hash opcode and VTABLE entry Remove the opcode 'hash'.

Re: launched PMC PDD

2007-09-21 Thread Andy Dougherty
On Thu, 20 Sep 2007, Allison Randal wrote: > Andy Dougherty wrote: > > > > I had two questions: > > > > 1. Is the order of elements in struct PMC deliberate? > > Nope, just the order I copied them in when collapsing the struct. > > > > >struct PMC { > >Parrot_UInt

The first week of micro-articles

2007-09-21 Thread Adriano Ferreira
I just posted a report on this first week of the series of micro-articles on Perl 6 operators. Read it at use.perl: http://use.perl.org/~ferreira/journal/ Thank you all for the help so far. Adriano.

Re: [perl #45601] [unified_testing] Plans and notes for the unified testing branch

2007-09-21 Thread Paul Cochrane
> 2) Write a coding standard test to make sure that t/* tests call out a > location >independent parrot/interpreter. Just for your information: you might be most of the way there on this part of the proposal. We already have a similar test for #!perl shebang lines, see: lib/Perl/Critic/Poli

Re: [ANN] Lua on Parrot 0.4.16

2007-09-21 Thread François PERRAD
At 11:40 19/09/2007 -0700, chromatic wrote: On Wednesday 19 September 2007 09:58:56 François PERRAD wrote: > Any comments, suggestions, bug report, test, improvement are welcome on > Parrot mailing list ([EMAIL PROTECTED]). Two tests fail reliably for me on x86 GNU/Linux, and one fails now and

Re: [svn:parrot] r21437 - branches/pdd15oo/src/ops

2007-09-21 Thread Joshua Isom
-Werror -Wdeclaration-after-statement Should work according to the manpage. But just one little problem. src/string.c In file included from src/string.c:26: src/string_private_cstring.h:21: warning: size of 'parrot_cstrings' is 7560 bytes *** Error code 1 So we'd have to change some things a

Re: [BUG?] main isn't in src/parrot.c

2007-09-21 Thread parrotcode
On Sep 21, 2:59 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Chromatic) wrote: > On Thursday 20 September 2007 06:58:55 Paul Cochrane via RT wrote: > > > On Sat Mar 10 19:15:20 2007, coke wrote: > > > From docs/BROKEN.pod. > > > > Is this something that needs fixing? > > > > (it's in compilers/imcc/main.c) > > There is

Re: [PROPOSAL] Remove "->" syntax from IMCC

2007-09-21 Thread parrotcode
On Sep 21, 12:07 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Allison Randal) wrote: > kjs wrote: > >>> In order to keep PIR syntax clean, I propose to remove the -> syntax for > >>> method calls, as it is the same as the dot-notation. > > Also agreed. Get it into DEPRECATED.pod now so we can remove it after > the next

[perl #45601] [unified_testing] Plans and notes for the unified testing branch

2007-09-21 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Colin Kuskie # Please include the string: [perl #45601] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=45601 > http://perlsix.org/svn/parrot/view/branches/unified_testing/BRANCH_TODO Goals: Comple

Re: [svn:parrot] r21429 - in trunk: include/parrot src/gc

2007-09-21 Thread chromatic
On Thursday 20 September 2007 09:38:28 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Modified: >trunk/include/parrot/register.h >trunk/src/gc/register.c > > Log: > [gc]: add 'struct' to Parrot_Context in func decls/defs I'm not much of a fan of this because: > Modified: trunk/src/gc/register.c > ==