Who works on which platform?

2007-07-14 Thread Andy Lester
Can y'all please go update this page and talk about what platforms you're using? I can never keep track of who's doing what. http://www.perlfoundation.org/parrot/index.cgi?platforms -- Andy Lester => [EMAIL PROTECTED] => www.petdance.com => AIM:petdance

[perl #43899] [BUG] 'make' broken on Darwin

2007-07-14 Thread James Keenan via RT
Closing ticket.

Re: [perl #43899] [BUG] 'make' broken on Darwin

2007-07-14 Thread Mark Glines
On Sat, 14 Jul 2007 11:54:26 -0700 James Keenan (via RT) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > # New Ticket Created by James Keenan > # Please include the string: [perl #43899] > # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. > # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=43899

Re: [svn:parrot] r19863 - in trunk/lib/Parrot: . Configure

2007-07-14 Thread chromatic
On Saturday 14 July 2007 12:57:37 Paul Cochrane wrote: > I realized a while after having written my last email that I lost a > bit opportunity in sending such a short reply: to actually *learn* > something and to improve my skills with Perl. I shall attempt to take > that opportunity now if you h

Re: [perl #43815] pmc2c generates wrong #line numbers for languages/perl6/src/pmc/perl6str.pmc

2007-07-14 Thread Mark Glines
On Thu, 12 Jul 2007 09:26:25 -0700 Mark Glines <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I don't have a fix (yet), but here's a patch to add a couple of tests > for it. One test makes sure it emits the right #line when a complex > pmclass statement is all on one line, and the second makes sure #line > is adjus

[perl #43869] MultiSub arg processing quits after :flat

2007-07-14 Thread Bob Rogers
From: Bob Rogers (via RT) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 19:57:23 -0700 # New Ticket Created by Bob Rogers # Please include the string: [perl #43869] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?

Re: [svn:parrot] r19863 - in trunk/lib/Parrot: . Configure

2007-07-14 Thread Nicholas Clark
On Sat, Jul 14, 2007 at 04:02:50PM -0400, James E Keenan wrote: > chromatic wrote: > >On Saturday 14 July 2007 09:05:02 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >>Author: paultcochrane > >>Date: Sat Jul 14 09:05:01 2007 > >>New Revision: 19863 > >> > >>Modified: > >> trunk/lib/Parrot/Configure.pm > >> trunk

Re: [svn:parrot] r19863 - in trunk/lib/Parrot: . Configure

2007-07-14 Thread James E Keenan
chromatic wrote: On Saturday 14 July 2007 09:05:02 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: paultcochrane Date: Sat Jul 14 09:05:01 2007 New Revision: 19863 Modified: trunk/lib/Parrot/Configure.pm trunk/lib/Parrot/Configure/Data.pm trunk/lib/Parrot/Configure/Step.pm Log: [lib] Using explicit

Re: [svn:parrot] r19863 - in trunk/lib/Parrot: . Configure

2007-07-14 Thread Paul Cochrane
I realized a while after having written my last email that I lost a bit opportunity in sending such a short reply: to actually *learn* something and to improve my skills with Perl. I shall attempt to take that opportunity now if you have the time and patience for me. On 14/07/07, chromatic <[EMA

Re: [svn:parrot] r19863 - in trunk/lib/Parrot: . Configure

2007-07-14 Thread Paul Cochrane
On 14/07/07, chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Saturday 14 July 2007 09:05:02 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Author: paultcochrane > Date: Sat Jul 14 09:05:01 2007 > New Revision: 19863 > > Modified: >trunk/lib/Parrot/Configure.pm >trunk/lib/Parrot/Configure/Data.pm >trunk/lib/Parro

[perl #43885] [TODO] Add Parrot::Test::language_error_output_[is|like|isnt]

2007-07-14 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Bernhard Schmalhofer # Please include the string: [perl #43885] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=43885 > Currently there are no test function for testing the error output of language im

Re: [perl #43899] [BUG] 'make' broken on Darwin

2007-07-14 Thread chromatic
On Saturday 14 July 2007 11:54:26 James Keenan wrote: > I've gotten 'make' failures twice on Darwin this afternoon, both > after 'make realclean' and 'svn update'. (But 'make' is passing on > my Linux box.) > > Please see attached failure report. Thank you very much. Can you post a few lines ar

[perl #43899] [BUG] 'make' broken on Darwin

2007-07-14 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by James Keenan # Please include the string: [perl #43899] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=43899 > I've gotten 'make' failures twice on Darwin this afternoon, both after 'make realclean

[perl #43869] MultiSub arg processing quits after :flat

2007-07-14 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Bob Rogers # Please include the string: [perl #43869] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=43869 > The attached test case illustrates the problem; anything after the first :flat arg is i

Re: [perl #43481] t/examples/shootout.t (shootout_16.pir) fails on gentoo/x86

2007-07-14 Thread chromatic
On Saturday 14 July 2007 02:45:59 Nicholas Clark wrote: > On Sun, Jul 08, 2007 at 10:07:34PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > It seems to run correctly on gentoo running on a sparc. > > Is gentoo sparc an architecture with 64 bit pointers (and longs)? I started to wonder the same thing. How d

Re: [svn:parrot] r19863 - in trunk/lib/Parrot: . Configure

2007-07-14 Thread chromatic
On Saturday 14 July 2007 09:05:02 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Author: paultcochrane > Date: Sat Jul 14 09:05:01 2007 > New Revision: 19863 > > Modified: >trunk/lib/Parrot/Configure.pm >trunk/lib/Parrot/Configure/Data.pm >trunk/lib/Parrot/Configure/Step.pm > > Log: > [lib] Using explicit

Re: [perl #43481] t/examples/shootout.t (shootout_16.pir) fails on gentoo/x86

2007-07-14 Thread Nicholas Clark
On Sun, Jul 08, 2007 at 10:07:34PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > It seems to run correctly on gentoo running on a sparc. Is gentoo sparc an architecture with 64 bit pointers (and longs)? Nicholas Clark

Re: Documenting Perl6 part 2

2007-07-14 Thread Mark Overmeer
* Damian Conway ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [070711 11:12]: > Just a brief note to reassure Mark--and everyone else who's interested-- > that I'm not ignoring his post...I'm just fully occupied at the moment > with other (paying) work. In the meantime I'm thinking very carefully > about what Mark suggested