Re: [perl #43481] t/examples/shootout.t (shootout_16.pir) fails on gentoo/x86

2007-07-08 Thread chromatic
On Sunday 08 July 2007 14:45:53 Bob Rogers wrote: >From: James E Keenan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Date: Sun, 08 Jul 2007 15:18:21 -0400 > >On Debian 4.0 Linux, t/examples/shootout.t is failing even more tests >than yesterday. See attached. > >kid51 > > I get the same failures on Su

[perl #42261] Extensive failures in t/compilers/imcc/imcpasm/*.t and t/pmc/sub.t

2007-07-08 Thread James Keenan via RT
These tests have been passing for the past month.

[perl #42106] t/pmc/iterator.t t/src/io.t failed on Linux

2007-07-08 Thread James Keenan via RT
These tests have been passing for a month. Closing ticket.

[perl #42362] [TODO]: Unit tests for modules used during configuration

2007-07-08 Thread James Keenan via RT
This ticket has been superseded by the RT tickets I created two weeks ago for each of the current 56 configuration steps.

[perl #41871] [BUG]: t/pmc/metaclass.t fails on Darwin

2007-07-08 Thread James Keenan via RT
t/pmc/metaclass.t was dropped from the Parrot distribution not long after this ticket was filed.

[perl #41607] t/compilers/pge/p5regex/dummy.t failure

2007-07-08 Thread James Keenan via RT
dummy.t appears to have been dropped from trunk.

[perl #40815] Summary of 'make test' failures on Darwin

2007-07-08 Thread James Keenan via RT
Resolved for same reason as http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=40803

[perl #40803] [BUG] 'make' fails on Darwin at -lgmp

2007-07-08 Thread James Keenan via RT
This ticket should have been closed months ago. Once I was shown what arguments I had to provide to Configure.pl and understood why I had to do that (my own misguided attempts to build gcc), the problem cleared up.

Re: [perl #43653] [BUG] Parrot book chapters not in POD format

2007-07-08 Thread James E Keenan
(I'm not sure whether this made it from RT to the list the first time.) James Keenan via RT wrote: On Sun Jul 08 17:36:30 2007, jkeen at verizon.net wrote: > > Will have to investigate further. The test made an inappropriate assumption about the top-level directory. Fixed in r19705. ===

Re: [perl #43661] [CAGE] Get parrot configuration to autodiscover gcc warning flags

2007-07-08 Thread James E Keenan
Paul Cochrane wrote: Perl 5 is able to work out automatically the warnings flags of gcc and then use those for compilation. Can you supply a link to the Perl 5 source that does this?

[perl #43653] [BUG] Parrot book chapters not in POD format

2007-07-08 Thread James Keenan via RT
Closing ticket.

[perl #43653] [BUG] Parrot book chapters not in POD format

2007-07-08 Thread James Keenan via RT
On Sun Jul 08 13:20:23 2007, chromatic at wgz.org wrote: > > They're not in POD format, they're in PseudoPod. r19316 should have > updated > this test to skip those files. Did it not work? > > The relevant lines are 77 and 78: > > # Skip the book, because it uses extended O'Reilly-specifi

[perl #43657] [PATCH] Grammatical error in docs/vtables.pod

2007-07-08 Thread Paul Cochrane via RT
Thanks again! Applied in r19703.

[perl #43659] [PATCH] typo in docs/art/pp001-intro.pod

2007-07-08 Thread Paul Cochrane via RT
Many thanks! Applied as r19702.

[perl #43659] [PATCH] typo in docs/art/pp001-intro.pod

2007-07-08 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Bob Wilkinson # Please include the string: [perl #43659] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=43659 > Hello Missing verb. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/src/parrot$ svn diff docs/art/pp001-intr

[perl #43661] [CAGE] Get parrot configuration to autodiscover gcc warning flags

2007-07-08 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Paul Cochrane # Please include the string: [perl #43661] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=43661 > At present we have to specify warnings flags for each version of gcc (see config/auto/g

Re: [perl #43481] t/examples/shootout.t (shootout_16.pir) fails on gentoo/x86

2007-07-08 Thread Bob Rogers
From: James E Keenan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun, 08 Jul 2007 15:18:21 -0400 On Debian 4.0 Linux, t/examples/shootout.t is failing even more tests than yesterday. See attached. kid51 I get the same failures on SuSE 9.0 GNU/Linux, Parrot r19701. Here's an interesting observati

[perl #43657] [PATCH] Grammatical error in docs/vtables.pod

2007-07-08 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Bob Wilkinson # Please include the string: [perl #43657] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=43657 > Hello I do not think that "type-inference" is a verb. "Infer" is, however. I

Re: [perl #43481] t/examples/shootout.t (shootout_16.pir) fails on gentoo/x86

2007-07-08 Thread bob
On Sun, Jul 08, 2007 at 03:26:14PM -0400, James E Keenan wrote: > t/examples/shootout.t is failing even worse today than yesterday. > [li11-226:fresh] 538 $ prove -v t/examples/shootout.t > t/examples/shootout1..20 > # Looks like you failed 8 tests of 20. > dubious > Test returned s

Re: [perl #43641] PASM registers limited to 0-99

2007-07-08 Thread Leopold Toetsch
Am Sonntag, 8. Juli 2007 17:41 schrieb Klaas-Jan Stol: > hi, > > I was planning to do some updates for the "book' (docs/dev/book), and it's > still saying that one can use 0-31 registers in PASM. It doesn't make sense to start updating such minor things. You'll end up rewriting almost all of the

Re: [perl #43653] [BUG] Parrot book chapters not in POD format

2007-07-08 Thread chromatic
On Sunday 08 July 2007 12:23:48 James Keenan wrote: > # New Ticket Created by James Keenan > # Please include the string: [perl #43653] > # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. > # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=43653 > > > > --- > osname= linux > osv

[perl #43653] [BUG] Parrot book chapters not in POD format

2007-07-08 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by James Keenan # Please include the string: [perl #43653] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=43653 > --- osname= linux osvers= 2.6.18.3 arch= i486-linux-gnu-thread-multi cc= cc --- Fl

[perl #43655] [PATCH] Make Parrot::Configure method name more self-documenting

2007-07-08 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by James Keenan # Please include the string: [perl #43655] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=43655 > --- osname= linux osvers= 2.6.18.3 arch= i486-linux-gnu-thread-multi cc= cc --- Fl

Re: [perl #43481] t/examples/shootout.t (shootout_16.pir) fails on gentoo/x86

2007-07-08 Thread James E Keenan
t/examples/shootout.t is failing even worse today than yesterday. [li11-226:fresh] 538 $ prove -v t/examples/shootout.t t/examples/shootout1..20 # Failed test (t/examples/shootout.t at line 103) # Exited with error code: [SIGNAL 11] # Received: # # Expected: # Ack(3, 9) = 4093 # not ok

Re: [perl #43481] t/examples/shootout.t (shootout_16.pir) fails on gentoo/x86

2007-07-08 Thread James E Keenan
On Debian 4.0 Linux, t/examples/shootout.t is failing even more tests than yesterday. See attached. kid51 [li11-226:fresh] 538 $ prove -v t/examples/shootout.t t/examples/shootout1..20 # Failed test (t/examples/shootout.t at line 103) # Exited with error code: [SIGNAL 11] # Received:

[perl #43641] PASM registers limited to 0-99

2007-07-08 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Klaas-Jan Stol # Please include the string: [perl #43641] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=43641 > hi, I was planning to do some updates for the "book' (docs/dev/book), and it's still

Re: [perl #43641] PASM registers limited to 0-99

2007-07-08 Thread Will Coleda
This is a duplicate of http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=41788 And probably requires Allison to make a determination. Regards. On Jul 8, 2007, at 11:41 AM, Klaas-Jan Stol (via RT) wrote: # New Ticket Created by Klaas-Jan Stol # Please include the string: [perl #43641] # in the

Re: [svn:parrot] r19686 - trunk/src

2007-07-08 Thread chromatic
On Sunday 08 July 2007 01:26:20 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Author: petdance > Date: Sun Jul 8 01:26:19 2007 > New Revision: 19686 > > Modified: >trunk/src/sub.c > > Log: > reversed the sense of the initial tests. Removes a return, and quiets some > lint warnings. I'm not really a fan of inc

PIR syntax clean ups page wiki

2007-07-08 Thread Klaas-Jan Stol
hi, PIR syntax has evolved over the years; new features have been added and old features/syntax has been removed. As more and more PIR code is being written, it is important to settle the PIR syntax at some point, so that any changes are limited to the current amount of PIR code that is out there

[perl #43639] [PATCH] config/auto/perldoc.pm: Inappropriate variable name

2007-07-08 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by James Keenan # Please include the string: [perl #43639] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=43639 > --- osname= linux osvers= 2.6.18.3 arch= i486-linux-gnu-thread-multi cc= cc --- Fl

[perl #43613] remove 'compile' opcode

2007-07-08 Thread Paul Cochrane via RT
On Sat Jul 07 08:14:04 2007, coke wrote: > > This op has been long deprecated. it should be removed. I removed the opcode, regenerated the ops.num file, removed the two obsolete japh tests using the 'compile' opcode, but unfortunately another japh test fails, namely the one in examples/japh/jap