(I'm not sure whether this made it from RT to the list the first time.)
James Keenan via RT wrote:
On Sun Jul 08 17:36:30 2007, jkeen <!-- x --> at verizon.net wrote:
>
> Will have to investigate further.
The test made an inappropriate assumption about the top-level directory.
Fixed in r19705.
=========================================================
==========
--- t/doc/pod.t (revision 19704)
+++ t/doc/pod.t (working copy)
@@ -75,7 +75,8 @@
next unless -e $file;
# Skip the book, because it uses extended O'Reilly-specific POD
- next if $file =~ m{parrot/docs/book/};
+# next if $file =~ m{parrot/docs/book/};
+ next if $file =~ m{docs/book/};
# skip files without POD
next unless Pod::Find::contains_pod( $file, 0 );
